Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] avformat/imfdec: use CPL start timecode if available

2022-10-29 Thread Zane van Iperen
lgtm, will apply in a few days if no objections On 29/10/22 00:55, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: Hi Zane et al., Quick ping on the revised patchset below. It addresses https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/9842. Best, -- Pierre On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 9:28 AM wrote: From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ffmpeg: fix implementation of updated input start time

2022-10-29 Thread Gyan Doshi
Any objections? On 2022-10-25 09:28 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote: Ping. On 2022-10-21 10:01 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote: The current adjustment of input start times just adjusts the tsoffset. And it does so, by resetting the tsoffset to nullify the new start time. This leads to breakage of -copyts, ignoring

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0

2022-10-29 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 29.10.2022 20:29, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi According to our https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams Noone and nothing is using 5.0 should i make another release of 5.0 ? should i move 5.0 to olddownloads ? does anyone use it ? plan

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] avcodec/cbs: Check ctx for NULL in ff_cbs_flush()

2022-10-29 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Michael Niedermayer: > Fixes: null pointer dereference > Fixes: > 52155/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_BSF_DTS2PTS_fuzzer-5760107527143424 > > Found-by: continuous fuzzing process > https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > ---

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0

2022-10-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi > > According to our > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams > > Noone and nothing is using 5.0 > should i make another release of 5.0 ? > should i move 5.0 to olddownloads ? > > does anyone use it ? plan to use it or know of som

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: add pkg-config check for OpenAL

2022-10-29 Thread Philip Langdale
On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:12:44 +0200 Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > --- > configure | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/configure b/configure > index 70c9e41dcc..30f0ce4e26 100755 > --- a/configure > +++ b/configure > @@ -6757,7 +6757,8 @@ enabled mmal

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: add pkg-config check for OpenAL

2022-10-29 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
--- configure | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 70c9e41dcc..30f0ce4e26 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -6757,7 +6757,8 @@ enabled mmal && { check_lib mmal interface/mmal/mmal.h mmal_port_co

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/mpegvideo_enc: Initialize dct_unquantize_int(ra|er) only once

2022-10-29 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Andreas Rheinhardt: > For encoders, mpeg_quant is an option of the MPEG-4 encoder > and therefore constant. This implies that one can set > the dct_unquantize_(intra|inter) function pointers during init. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt > --- > libavcodec/mpegvideo_enc.c | 22 +++---

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub releases section is very old

2022-10-29 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 29.10.2022 14:36, * Neustradamus * wrote: Hello all, It is possible to remove all releases from GitHub? Because at right, we can see and it is not good promotion for this active project: - https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg Releases 11 FFmpeg 3.0 Release Latest on 15 Feb 2016 + 10 releases -

[FFmpeg-devel] GitHub releases section is very old

2022-10-29 Thread * Neustradamus *
Hello all, It is possible to remove all releases from GitHub? Because at right, we can see and it is not good promotion for this active project: - https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg Releases 11 FFmpeg 3.0 Release Latest on 15 Feb 2016 + 10 releases - https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/releases The

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/v210enc: add new function for avx2 avx512 avx512icl

2022-10-29 Thread Christophe Gisquet
Hello, Le ven. 28 oct. 2022 à 20:57, James Darnley a écrit : > +%else > +pand m1, m6, m1 > +pandn m0, m6, m0 > +porm0, m0, m1 > +%endif Isn't that pattern a vpblendb or some such ? -- Christophe