> 在 2021年12月26日,上午8:55,lance.lmw...@gmail.com 写道:
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 05:15:19PM +, Soft Works wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
>>> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
>>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 05:15:19PM +, Soft Works wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> > Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
> >
> > 2
The whole concept is just not correct, also as it seems not to be needed
at all, all dng files i have decode without this.
Fixes: various crashes
Fixes:
42937/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_TIFF_fuzzer-4625073334517760
Fixes:
42938/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODE
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > holidays are ap
23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for everybody.
>
> A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
> GitHub in a similar way as the Git developers are
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael
> Niedermayer
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 12:12 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 12:31:56PM +0300, Vasily wrote:
> > Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Vasily
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 10:32 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the top
From: Limin Wang
---
libavcodec/libx264.c | 44 ++--
libavcodec/libx265.c | 48
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/libx264.c b/libavcodec/libx264.c
index 9836818..c5e
From: Limin Wang
Most of user data unregistered SEIs are privated data which defined by user/
encoder. currently, the user data unregistered SEIs found in input are forwarded
as side-data to encoders directly, it'll cause the reencoded output including
some
useless UDU SEIs.
I prefer to add one
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 02:15:36PM +0100, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> Applied a slightly modified version.
> Just so it avoids cycling through the side data loop entirely when it's
> never going to be needed.
Thanks, it's better, I'll move the check out of loop for libx264 and libx265
to avoid the
From: Steven Liu
Because the AVBPrint->len is unsigned, so it should alway true,
the AVBPrint->len < INT64_MAX is unneccessary condition.
Signed-off-by: Steven Liu
---
libavformat/fitsdec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/fitsdec.c b/libavformat/
Applied a slightly modified version.
Just so it avoids cycling through the side data loop entirely when it's
never going to be needed.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://
> 在 2021年12月25日,19:42,zhilizhao(赵志立) 写道:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 25, 2021, at 6:36 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 25 Dec 2021, Zhao Zhili wrote:
>>
>>> Fix #8883.
>>> ---
>>> doc/demuxers.texi | 6 ++
>>> libavformat/isom.h | 1 +
>>> libavformat/mov.c | 9 +++--
>>> 3 files changed
> On Dec 25, 2021, at 6:36 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2021, Zhao Zhili wrote:
>
>> Fix #8883.
>> ---
>> doc/demuxers.texi | 6 ++
>> libavformat/isom.h | 1 +
>> libavformat/mov.c | 9 +++--
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/de
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 12:31:56PM +0300, Vasily wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
> misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
> really explicit?
>
> Second one, why first-comers aren't allowed to submit wi
> 在 2021年12月25日,18:36,Marton Balint 写道:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2021, Zhao Zhili wrote:
>
>> Fix #8883.
>> ---
>> doc/demuxers.texi | 6 ++
>> libavformat/isom.h | 1 +
>> libavformat/mov.c | 9 +++--
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/demuxers
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 03:29:50PM -0500, John-Paul Stewart wrote:
> On 2021-12-24 11:58, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:32:12PM -0500, John-Paul Stewart wrote:
> >> On 2021-12-23 16:15, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> Fixes: division by zero
> >>> Fixes:
> >>> 42814/cl
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:45:47PM +0100, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > Fixes: left shift of 255 by 24 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
> > Fixes:
> > 42766/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_CDGRAPHICS_fuzzer-5142826105569280
> >
> > Found-by: cont
On Sat, 25 Dec 2021, Zhao Zhili wrote:
Fix #8883.
---
doc/demuxers.texi | 6 ++
libavformat/isom.h | 1 +
libavformat/mov.c | 9 +++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/demuxers.texi b/doc/demuxers.texi
index cab8a7072c..276b536ac5 100644
--- a/doc/dem
Fix #8883.
---
doc/demuxers.texi | 6 ++
libavformat/isom.h | 1 +
libavformat/mov.c | 9 +++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/demuxers.texi b/doc/demuxers.texi
index cab8a7072c..276b536ac5 100644
--- a/doc/demuxers.texi
+++ b/doc/demuxers.texi
@@ -71
Typo correction: "the bot should remove", not "the boy" (oh my mobile
tapping...)
сб, 25 дек. 2021 г., 12:31 Vasily :
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
> misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
> really explicit?
Hi,
First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
really explicit?
Second one, why first-comers aren't allowed to submit without pre-approval?
(context: I haven't made my contributions to ffmpeg
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 9:52 PM Kyle Swanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Never followed through on this vf_libvmaf patch from last June, and
> I've had several people asking about its status lately. Rebased patch
> attached. It's been a while, so I guess let's start the review again.
> Would be nice if we c
> On Dec 25, 2021, at 3:08 AM, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>
> On 12/24/2021 10:46 AM, Steven Liu wrote:
>> I think about ignore hoov should not default, because it use hoov
>> default before.
>
> I agree - we (Vimeo) get a ton of hoov files with no moov or broken moov -
> much more than files
Fix #8883.
---
libavformat/mov.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
index ea2f010aa0..5787a20124 100644
--- a/libavformat/mov.c
+++ b/libavformat/mov.c
@@ -7324,8 +7324,9 @@ static int mov_read_default(MOVContext *c, AVIOC
It's required for #8883. VLC and quicktime player can handle the
sample file.
---
libavformat/mov.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
index 2aed6e80ef..ea2f010aa0 100644
--- a/libavformat/mov.c
+++ b/libavformat/mov.c
@@ -73
26 matches
Mail list logo