On 03/16/2016 12:09 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 11:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Why are always
On 03/16/2016 11:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of the context is
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
> >On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >
> >Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of t
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>> On 3/14/2016 11:22 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 9f9ed79d4cb40e5d9093899f8a79086ff23da844.
>>>
>>> The hlsopts member was never set anywhere and always NU
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 10:05:08 CET)
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:47:05 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>> Well, OK. Although in one way I'm the author, since I was the one who
>> cut and pasted his changes. I might has well have written them
>> myself.
>
>No! Don't do this! How can you e
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>
>Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of the context is of
>interest? I'm tired of skipping all this stuff... I must find
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:47:05 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> Well, OK. Although in one way I'm the author, since I was the one who
> cut and pasted his changes. I might has well have written them
> myself.
No! Don't do this! How can you even think that way?
BTW, that's exactly what some people
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of the context is of
interest? I'm tired of skipping all this stuff... I must find that mutt
patch again. (Mats, this isn't personally directe
Josh de Kock skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:41:48 CET)
>On 16/03/2016 08:31, Mats Peterson wrote:
>> I can't really use Barbato as the author, since I was the one who
>> included his changes, so I'm the author. But perhaps there is some
>way
>> to attribute him properly in spite of that?
>Patches' author
On 16/03/2016 08:31, Mats Peterson wrote:
I can't really use Barbato as the author, since I was the one who
included his changes, so I'm the author. But perhaps there is some way
to attribute him properly in spite of that?
Patches' authors are generally based on who originally wrote the patch,
o
On 03/16/2016 08:19 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
This patch is based on libav commit
f8c34f4b8d62afad3f63cf3d9617d73735bef8c1 by Luca Barbato. It fixes
vertical banding artifacts and washed-out display of Intel Real Time
Video 2.1. There's still some banding, but that's probably inherent to
the codec
On 03/16/2016 09:17 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:12 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wr
Ismail Donmez i10z.com> writes:
> This fixes cross-build on Linux with mingw-w64. Patch attached. This
> will not break MSVC because Windows is case-insensitive unlike Linux.
Patch applied, thank you!
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-d
On 03/16/2016 09:12 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
>
On 03/16/2016 09:10 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wr
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
>
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wr
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>
>
>
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
You say the libav commits are merged every day. This commit was posted
February 22, that's quite a w
On 03/16/2016 08:56 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:19 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
This patch is based on libav commit
f8c34f4b8d62afad3f63cf3d9617d73735bef8c1 by Luca Barbato. It fixes
vertical banding artifacts and washed-out di
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 08:19 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>
>> This patch is based on libav commit
>> f8c34f4b8d62afad3f63cf3d9617d73735bef8c1 by Luca Barbato. It fixes
>> vertical banding artifacts and washed-out display of Intel Real Time
>> Video 2.1.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>
>> On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> You say the libav commits are merged every day. This commit was posted
>>> February 22, that's quite a while ago. What is it that causes t
On 03/16/2016 08:19 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
This patch is based on libav commit
f8c34f4b8d62afad3f63cf3d9617d73735bef8c1 by Luca Barbato. It fixes
vertical banding artifacts and washed-out display of Intel Real Time
Video 2.1. There's still some banding, but that's probably inherent to
the codec
This patch is based on libav commit
f8c34f4b8d62afad3f63cf3d9617d73735bef8c1 by Luca Barbato. It fixes
vertical banding artifacts and washed-out display of Intel Real Time
Video 2.1. There's still some banding, but that's probably inherent to
the codec.
Mats
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.
27 matches
Mail list logo