We are doing some work where we need to do run-time quadrature over
arbitrary polyhedra. For this reason, we would like to generate code
for evaluating the integrand of a form at an arbitrary point within
the cell.
I would propose adding something like this to each of the *_integral
classes in the
On 12/04/10 20:47, Anders Logg wrote:
We are doing some work where we need to do run-time quadrature over
arbitrary polyhedra.
We (Mehdi and I) do this already (using UFC), so I don't see why a new
function is required. Can you explain why evaluate_tensor is not enough?
Garth
For this re
On 12/04/10 21:19, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 20:47, Anders Logg wrote:
We are doing some work where we need to do run-time quadrature over
arbitrary polyhedra.
We (Mehdi and I) do this already (using UFC), so I don't see why a new
function is required. Can you explain why evaluate_
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/10 21:19, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 12/04/10 20:47, Anders Logg wrote:
> >>We are doing some work where we need to do run-time quadrature over
> >>arbitrary polyhedra.
> >
> >We (Mehdi and I) do this already (u
On 12/04/10 21:29, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 21:19, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 20:47, Anders Logg wrote:
We are doing some work where we need to do run-time quadrature over
arbitrary polyhedra.
We (Mehdi and I)
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:34:38PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/10 21:29, Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 12/04/10 21:19, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 12/04/10 20:47, Anders Logg wrote:
> We are d
On 12/04/10 21:49, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:34:38PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 21:29, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 21:19, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 20:47, Anders Logg wrote:
W
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Andy Ray Terrel wrote:
>>
>> Okay so Brezzi Fortin have just a bubble function with one node.
>> Perhaps they meant P3 but their notation is ambiguous.
>> ArnoldBrezziFortin1984 does call for the P3 in the original paper but
>> then they menti
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:20:13PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/10 21:49, Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:34:38PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 12/04/10 21:29, Anders Logg wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >
Hi!
Anders and I are working on an implementation for Nitsche's method, where the
question of integration on cut cell and facets also (beside XFEM for you) came
up.
On Monday 12. April 2010 16.20.13 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 12/04/10 21:49, Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:34
On 12/04/10 23:35, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:20:13PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 21:49, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:34:38PM +0800, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 21:29, Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Gar
On 13/04/10 00:16, Andre Massing wrote:
Hi!
Anders and I are working on an implementation for Nitsche's method, where the
question of integration on cut cell and facets also (beside XFEM for you) came
up.
On Monday 12. April 2010 16.20.13 Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 12/04/10 21:49, Anders Logg
12 matches
Mail list logo
