Re: [Ffc] [Dolfin] [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/main] Rev 4434: Set parameter to use tensor rep for DG Poisson demo. It's broken.

2010-02-03 Thread Garth N. Wells
Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:32PM -, nore...@launchpad.net wrote: >> >> revno: 4434 >> committer: Garth N. Wells >> branch nick: dolfin-all >> timestamp: Tue 2010-02-02 23:16:44 + >> message: >> Set para

Re: [Ffc] strip_variables

2010-02-03 Thread Garth N. Wells
Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > On 2 February 2010 23:26, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from >> inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug > > I remember that there was a problem with calling the algorithm_strip > variables. I d

Re: [Ffc] [Bug 512425] Re: variable + facet restriction broken

2010-02-03 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
On 3 February 2010 09:48, Garth Wells wrote: Bug was in FFC, marking as invalid. ** Changed in: ufl       Status: Confirmed => Invalid I would call this a bug in UFL. from ufl.algorithms import propagate_restrictions cell = triangle V = FiniteElement("DG", cell, 1) u = Coefficient(V) flux2

Re: [Ffc] [Bug 512425] Re: variable + facet restriction broken

2010-02-03 Thread Garth N. Wells
Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > On 3 February 2010 09:48, Garth Wells wrote: >> Bug was in FFC, marking as invalid. >> >> ** Changed in: ufl >> Status: Confirmed => Invalid > > I would call this a bug in UFL. > > from ufl.algorithms import propagate_restrictions > cell = triangle > V =

Re: [Ffc] [Dolfin] [Branch ~dolfin-core/dolfin/main] Rev 4434: Set parameter to use tensor rep for DG Poisson demo. It's broken.

2010-02-03 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:04:54AM +, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:32PM -, nore...@launchpad.net wrote: > >> > >> revno: 4434 > >> committer: Garth N. Wells > >> branch nick: do

[Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Anders Logg
The regression test is failing of HyperElasticity. I guess this is after the recent work on stripping variables? Is this demo ok so we can update the reference? -- Anders signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad

Re: [Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
On 3 February 2010 13:21, Anders Logg wrote: The regression test is failing of HyperElasticity. I guess this is after the recent work on stripping variables? Is this demo ok so we can update the reference? I pushed a fix to ufl, and the tests are green apart from MixedMixedElement for whic

Re: [Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:27:51PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > On 3 February 2010 13:21, Anders Logg wrote: > >The regression test is failing of HyperElasticity. I guess this is > >after the recent work on stripping variables? > > > >Is this demo ok so we can update the reference? > > I

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-linux64-exp

2010-02-03 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux64-exp on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux64-exp/builds/170 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: linux64-exp Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-jaunty-amd64

2010-02-03 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-jaunty-amd64 on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-jaunty-amd64/builds/171 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: jaunty-amd64 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamel

Re: [Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:46:32PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:27:51PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > > > > On 3 February 2010 13:21, Anders Logg wrote: > > >The regression test is failing of HyperElasticity. I guess this is > > >after the recent work on stripping

Re: [Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
On 3 February 2010 20:03, Anders Logg wrote: On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:46:32PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:27:51PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > On 3 February 2010 13:21, Anders Logg wrote: > >The regression test is failing of HyperElasticity. I guess this i

Re: [Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:08:38PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > On 3 February 2010 20:03, Anders Logg wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:46:32PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > >>On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:27:51PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3 February 2010 13:21, A

Re: [Ffc] Regression test for HyperElasticity

2010-02-03 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
On 3 February 2010 20:11, Anders Logg wrote: On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:08:38PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: On 3 February 2010 20:03, Anders Logg wrote: >On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:46:32PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:27:51PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: >>