On 2 February 2010 00:06, Anders Logg wrote:
The unit tests are taking a very long time. Would it be possible to
add some printing along the way so it doesn't look like it's stalling?
I changed this, as did you, but I also added some additional info on which
element is currently being teste
On 2 February 2010 00:14, Anders Logg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:06:35AM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
The unit tests are taking a very long time. Would it be possible to
add some printing along the way so it doesn't look like it's stalling?
Some regression tests are still failing. Can th
There is still a problem. Now I get an DOLFIN error when I try to
assemble my system. I will look at it some more later today.
Garth
Original Message
Subject: [Branch ~ffc-core/ffc/main] Rev 1369: Fixed Garth's optimised
quadrature problem.
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:30:28 -
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:46:13AM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>
> On 2 February 2010 00:14, Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:06:35AM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> >>The unit tests are taking a very long time. Would it be possible to
> >>add some printing along the way so it do
I still have a problem with fractions + quadrature + optimisation. The
script I sent yesterday now works, but the below scripts leads to a FFC
error
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ffc/quadrature/sumobj.py",
line 495, in reduce_vartype
f, r = v.reduce_vartype(var_type)
V
On 2 February 2010 00:06, Anders Logg wrote:
The unit tests are taking a very long time. Would it be possible to
add some printing along the way so it doesn't look like it's stalling?
Some regression tests are still failing. Can these be ignored and
should we then update the references?
How
On 2 February 2010 10:15, Garth N. Wells wrote:
I still have a problem with fractions + quadrature + optimisation. The
script I sent yesterday now works, but the below scripts leads to a FFC
error
OK, I'll take a look now since my work on evaluate_basis is done.
Kristian
File
"/usr/lo
I tried looking at this but I'm unsure how it should be
handled. Should a cell_integral class be generated or should a
surface_integral class be generated?
--
Anders
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:21:51AM +0100, Medhi Nikbakht wrote:
> Hi Anders,
> This is the simplest form that I trying to compile.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>
> On 2 February 2010 00:06, Anders Logg wrote:
> >The unit tests are taking a very long time. Would it be possible to
> >add some printing along the way so it doesn't look like it's stalling?
> >
> >Some regression tests are st
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>
> On 2 February 2010 10:15, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >I still have a problem with fractions + quadrature + optimisation. The
> >script I sent yesterday now works, but the below scripts leads to a FFC
> >error
>
> OK, I'll take a
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:30 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> I tried looking at this but I'm unsure how it should be
> handled. Should a cell_integral class be generated or should a
> surface_integral class be generated?
>
We handle terms related to surface integral inside a class derived from
ufc::
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:42:23AM +0100, Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:30 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> > I tried looking at this but I'm unsure how it should be
> > handled. Should a cell_integral class be generated or should a
> > surface_integral class be generated?
> >
>
>
hi, i'm following up with you to keep close to the next release of fenics,
i just built everything (no errors) but for ffc i get
Exception: Unable to import the Python Scientific module required by FIAT.
Consider installing the package python-scientific.
can you tell me which package this is?
Patrick Riesen wrote:
> hi, i'm following up with you to keep close to the next release of fenics,
>
> i just built everything (no errors) but for ffc i get
>
>
> Exception: Unable to import the Python Scientific module required by FIAT.
> Consider installing the package python-scientific.
>
Garth N. Wells wrote:
Patrick Riesen wrote:
hi, i'm following up with you to keep close to the next release of fenics,
i just built everything (no errors) but for ffc i get
Exception: Unable to import the Python Scientific module required by FIAT.
Consider installing the package python-scien
More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
things running at second run:
m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ instant-clean
Instant cache is empty
m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ python test.py
Calling FFC just-in-time (JIT) compiler, this may
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
>
> More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
> things running at second run:
>
> m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ instant-clean
> Instant cache is empty
> m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity
On 02/02/2010 11:29, Marie Rognes wrote:
>
> More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
> things running at second run:
>
> m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ instant-clean
> Instant cache is empty
> m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ python test
Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 12:01 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0100, Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:52 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:24:46AM +0100, Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:11:33PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 12:01 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0100, Mehdi Nikbakht wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:52 +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 0
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:08:51PM +, Harish Narayanan wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 11:29, Marie Rognes wrote:
> >
> > More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
> > things running at second run:
> >
> > m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ instant-clean
> > Instant ca
Anders Logg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:08:51PM +, Harish Narayanan wrote:
On 02/02/2010 11:29, Marie Rognes wrote:
More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
things running at second run:
m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ instant-clean
Inst
On 02/02/2010 12:54, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:08:51PM +, Harish Narayanan wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/02/2010 11:29, Marie Rognes wrote:
>>>
More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
things running at second run:
On 2 February 2010 10:15, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> I still have a problem with fractions + quadrature + optimisation. The
> script I sent yesterday now works, but the below scripts leads to a FFC
> error
>
> File
> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ffc/quadrature/sumobj.py",
> line 495,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:28:11PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 10:15, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > I still have a problem with fractions + quadrature + optimisation. The
> > script I sent yesterday now works, but the below scripts leads to a FFC
> > error
> >
> > File
> >
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-hardy-i386 on FEniCS Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-hardy-i386/builds/155
Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/
Buildslave for this Build: hardy-i386
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: HEAD
Blamelist: A
On 2 February 2010 18:27, wrote:
>
> revno: 1387
> committer: Anders Logg
> branch nick: ffc-main
> timestamp: Tue 2010-02-02 18:24:56 +0100
> message:
> Disable element library testing in regression tests to get around error
> on bu
On 02/02/2010 16:28, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 10:15, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> I still have a problem with fractions + quadrature + optimisation. The
>> script I sent yesterday now works, but the below scripts leads to a FFC
>> error
>>
>>File
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 18:27, wrote:
> >
> > revno: 1387
> > committer: Anders Logg
> > branch nick: ffc-main
> > timestamp: Tue 2010-02-02 18:24:56 +0100
> > message:
>
The build bot is giving me a hard time. I'll make a release now and
then sort out the precision thing with Johannes tomorrow.
--
Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
Post to : ffc@lists.la
0.9.0
- Updates for FIAT 0.9.0
- Updates for UFC 1.4.0 (now supporting the full interface)
- Automatic selection of representation
- Change quadrature_order --> quadrature_degree
- Split compile() --> compile_form(), compile_element()
- Major cleanup and reorganization of code (flatter direct
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux64-exp on FEniCS Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux64-exp/builds/162
Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/
Buildslave for this Build: linux64-exp
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: HEAD
Blamelist
Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from
inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufl/+bug/512425
Garth
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-jaunty-amd64 on FEniCS Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-jaunty-amd64/builds/163
Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/
Buildslave for this Build: jaunty-amd64
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: HEAD
Blamel
Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:08:51PM +, Harish Narayanan wrote:
>> On 02/02/2010 11:29, Marie Rognes wrote:
>>> More compile strangeness: Clean cache, error at first run,
>>> things running at second run:
>>>
>>> m...@localhost ~/local/src/fenics/adaptivity/demo $ instant-
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:26:13PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from
> inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufl/+bug/512425
>
> Garth
Not sure if that's the right place to do it. I'll ha
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:45:41PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:26:13PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from
> > inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufl/+bug
Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:45:41PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:26:13PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>> Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from
>>> inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug
>>>
>>> https://bug
Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:45:41PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:26:13PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>> Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from
>>> inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug
>>>
>>> https://bug
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:32PM -, nore...@launchpad.net wrote:
>
> revno: 4434
> committer: Garth N. Wells
> branch nick: dolfin-all
> timestamp: Tue 2010-02-02 23:16:44 +
> message:
> Set parameter to use tensor rep for DG
On 2 February 2010 23:26, Garth N. Wells wrote:
Should the UFL function 'strip_variables' be called on a UFL form from
inside FFC? I suspect that this may fix the bug
I remember that there was a problem with calling the algorithm_strip variables.
I did that once as an easy fix to handle Var
41 matches
Mail list logo
