[Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Marie Rognes
Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Also can we remove all the _FIAT_ stuff from codesnippets? -- Marie ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchp

Re: [Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > > Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and > moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Could you make sure to make the corresponding changes in tensorgenerator.py, lines 66, 82, 99? > Also can we remove all the _

Re: [Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Marie Rognes
Anders Logg wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Could you make sure to make the corresponding changes in tensorgenerator.py, lines 66, 82, 99?

Re: [Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
2010/1/25 Anders Logg : On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Could you make sure to make the corresponding changes in tensorgenerator.py, lines 66, 82, 99? Also

Re: [Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Marie Rognes
Kristian Oelgaard wrote: 2010/1/25 Anders Logg : On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Could you make sure to make the corresponding changes in tensorgenerator.py

Re: [Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
2010/1/25 Marie Rognes : Kristian Oelgaard wrote: 2010/1/25 Anders Logg : On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Could you make sure to make the corresponding

Re: [Ffc] Jacobi code in codesnippets

2010-01-25 Thread Marie Rognes
Kristian Oelgaard wrote: 2010/1/25 Marie Rognes : Kristian Oelgaard wrote: 2010/1/25 Anders Logg : On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: Would anyone object if I removed jacobian_nD in codesnippets and moved only_jacobian_nD to jacobian_nD? Could you make sure

[Ffc] Bug in evaluate_basis_derivatives

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
There seems to be a bug in evaluate_basis_derivatives. To reproduce the bug, run the regression test and then enter the output directory and run ./P5tet.bin The bug seems to be somewhere inside this loop: for (unsigned int r = 0; r < 4; r++) { for (unsigned int s = 0; s < (4 - r); s++)

[Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing: Generating code --- 1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed *** FFC: Sorry, finite element of type "ElementRestriction" are not supported by FIAT. I assume Kristian knows what to do. 2. QuadratureElement.ufl failed

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Kristian Oelgaard
2010/1/25 Anders Logg : It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing: Generating code --- 1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed *** FFC: Sorry, finite element of type "ElementRestriction" are not supported by FIAT. I assume Kristian knows what to do. Ye

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:14:20PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > 2010/1/25 Anders Logg : > >It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing: > > > >Generating code > >--- > > > >1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed > > > >*** FFC: Sorry, finite element of type

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Marie Rognes
Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for RT/BDM/NED. (Aaargh, btw). Is the jit compilation working? -- Marie Anders Logg wrote: It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing: Generating code --- 1. ElementRestriction.ufl f

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > > Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for > RT/BDM/NED. > (Aaargh, btw). I hope to add more a selection of elements to the regression tests later. Then you can feel very free to help with the debugging. :-)

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Marie Rognes
Anders Logg wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for RT/BDM/NED. (Aaargh, btw). I hope to add more a selection of elements to the regression tests later. Then you can feel very free to help

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > Anders Logg wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > >>Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for > >>RT/BDM/NED. > >>(Aaargh, btw). > > > >I hope to add more a selection of ele

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > Anders Logg wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > >>Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for > >>RT/BDM/NED. > >>(Aaargh, btw). > > > >I hope to add more a selection of ele

Re: [Ffc] Status update

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > Anders Logg wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > >>Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for > >>RT/BDM/NED. > >>(Aaargh, btw). > > > >I hope to add more a selection of ele

[Ffc] Help wanted

2010-01-25 Thread Anders Logg
I have completed the implementation of regression testing and added references computed with FFC 0.7.1. If possible, I'd like some help in sorting through the output from the regression test, list issues that need fixing (and fix the issues). To run the regression tests, just enter test/regressio

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-linux64-exp

2010-01-25 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux64-exp on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux64-exp/builds/93 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: linux64-exp Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist:

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-mac-osx

2010-01-25 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-mac-osx on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-mac-osx/builds/93 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: mac-osx Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAI

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-jaunty-amd64

2010-01-25 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-jaunty-amd64 on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-jaunty-amd64/builds/94 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: jaunty-amd64 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blameli

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-hardy-i386

2010-01-25 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-hardy-i386 on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-hardy-i386/builds/95 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: hardy-i386 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: