Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (and parts of UFL). Both > > have grown out of hand and with limited resources (like Martin and > > Johan leaving for other ventures) w

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Johan Hake
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > > > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (and parts of UFL). Both > > > have grown out of hand and with limited

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-jaunty-amd64

2009-12-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-jaunty-amd64 on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-jaunty-amd64/builds/31 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: jaunty-amd64 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blameli

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-hardy-i386

2009-12-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-hardy-i386 on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-hardy-i386/builds/30 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: hardy-i386 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: Kr

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-linux64-exp

2009-12-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-linux64-exp on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-linux64-exp/builds/30 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: linux64-exp Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist:

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-winxp-mingw32

2009-12-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-winxp-mingw32 on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-winxp-mingw32/builds/31 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: winxp-mingw32 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blam

[Ffc] buildbot failure in FEniCS Buildbot on ffc-mac-osx

2009-12-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ffc-mac-osx on FEniCS Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://fenics.org:8080/builders/ffc-mac-osx/builds/30 Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ Buildslave for this Build: mac-osx Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: Kristian B.

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (an

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Johan Hake
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders

[Ffc] Buildbot problems

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
Johannes, there seems to be a problem with the buildbots. They are failing for FFC with the message from ffc.compiler import compile ImportError: cannot import name compile I had the same on my machine just now and I fixed it by removing both my FFC installation and the build directory and th

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, J

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Johan Hake
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Ande

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, J

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 A

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Johan Hake
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 09:17:17 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800,

Re: [Ffc] Buildbot problems

2009-12-09 Thread Johannes Ring
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > Johannes, there seems to be a problem with the buildbots. > They are failing for FFC with the message > >  from ffc.compiler import compile >  ImportError: cannot import name compile > > I had the same on my machine just now and I fixed it by re

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

2009-12-09 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:32:23AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 09:17:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 A