On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:42:52PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> >>Anders Logg wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Let me know if I should do anything else than adding un
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:42:52PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> >>Anders Logg wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Let me know if I should do anything else than adding un
Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
RT/BDM/NED.
(Aaargh, btw).
I hope to ad
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:37:12PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> 2010/1/25 Anders Logg :
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:14:20PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> >
> >> 2010/1/25 Anders Logg :
> >> >It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing:
> >> >
> >> >Generati
2010/1/25 Anders Logg :
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:14:20PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/25 Anders Logg :
>> >It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing:
>> >
>> >Generating code
>> >---
>> >
>> >1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed
>> >
>> >**
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> >>Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
> >>RT/BDM/NED.
> >>(Aaargh, btw).
> >
> >I hope to add more a selection of ele
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> >>Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
> >>RT/BDM/NED.
> >>(Aaargh, btw).
> >
> >I hope to add more a selection of ele
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:46:47PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> >>Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
> >>RT/BDM/NED.
> >>(Aaargh, btw).
> >
> >I hope to add more a selection of ele
Anders Logg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
RT/BDM/NED.
(Aaargh, btw).
I hope to add more a selection of elements to the regression tests
later. Then you can feel very free to help
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
>
> Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
> RT/BDM/NED.
> (Aaargh, btw).
I hope to add more a selection of elements to the regression tests
later. Then you can feel very free to help with the debugging. :-)
Let me know if I should do anything else than adding unit tests for
RT/BDM/NED.
(Aaargh, btw).
Is the jit compilation working?
--
Marie
Anders Logg wrote:
It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing:
Generating code
---
1. ElementRestriction.ufl f
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:14:20PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> 2010/1/25 Anders Logg :
> >It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing:
> >
> >Generating code
> >---
> >
> >1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed
> >
> >*** FFC: Sorry, finite element of type
2010/1/25 Anders Logg :
It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing:
Generating code
---
1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed
*** FFC: Sorry, finite element of type "ElementRestriction" are not
supported by FIAT.
I assume Kristian knows what to do.
Ye
It's starting to look better. The following 8 tests are currently failing:
Generating code
---
1. ElementRestriction.ufl failed
*** FFC: Sorry, finite element of type "ElementRestriction" are not
supported by FIAT.
I assume Kristian knows what to do.
2. QuadratureElement.ufl failed
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53:19PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > Don't know. Do you have a good test example?
>
> demo/pde/poisson/cpp
>
> ;).
Thats's a good example. And yes it works. :-)
--
Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Anders Logg wrote:
> Don't know. Do you have a good test example?
demo/pde/poisson/cpp
;).
Garth
>
> --
> Anders
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:50:40PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> Are named variables working in the DOLFIN wrapper code for ffc-dev? I
>> fixed this recently in ffc-main
Don't know. Do you have a good test example?
--
Anders
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:50:40PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> Are named variables working in the DOLFIN wrapper code for ffc-dev? I
> fixed this recently in ffc-main.
>
> Garth
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > The regression test script is sta
Are named variables working in the DOLFIN wrapper code for ffc-dev? I
fixed this recently in ffc-main.
Garth
Anders Logg wrote:
> The regression test script is starting to shape up. There's still some
> work to do but one can run it to generate code, check code against
> stored references and bui
The regression test script is starting to shape up. There's still some
work to do but one can run it to generate code, check code against
stored references and build test programs against the generated code.
Just enter test/regression and run python test.py. Errors are logged
to error.log.
Here a
19 matches
Mail list logo
