On 05/16/2011 08:13 PM, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
On 16. mai 2011, at 19:58, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
On 16 May 2011 14:33, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
On 16. mai 2011, at 14:17, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
On 16 May 2011 13:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells"
On 16. mai 2011, at 19:58, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
> On 16 May 2011 14:33, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>
>> On 16. mai 2011, at 14:17, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 May 2011 13:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
> I
On 16 May 2011 14:33, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>
> On 16. mai 2011, at 14:17, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
>
>> On 16 May 2011 13:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
>>>
I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC and
On 16/05/11 13:33, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>
> On 16. mai 2011, at 14:17, Kristian Ølgaard
> wrote:
>
>> On 16 May 2011 13:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells"
>>> wrote:
>>>
I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of
On 16. mai 2011, at 14:17, Kristian Ølgaard wrote:
> On 16 May 2011 13:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC and
>>> DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements
On 16 May 2011 13:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>
>
> On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
>
>> I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC and
>> DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements to UFL, FFC caching,
>> and there have been a good number of DOLF
On 16. mai 2011, at 13:52, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
>
>
> On 16/05/11 12:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL,
>>> FFC and DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvemen
On 16/05/11 12:49, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
>
>
> On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
>
>> I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL,
>> FFC and DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements to UFL,
>> FFC caching, and there have been a good number of DOL
On 16. mai 2011, at 12:13, "Garth N. Wells" wrote:
> I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC and
> DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements to UFL, FFC caching,
> and there have been a good number of DOLFIN bugs fixes. New version
> numbers would be:
>
> UF
I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC and
DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements to UFL, FFC caching,
and there have been a good number of DOLFIN bugs fixes. New version
numbers would be:
UFL: 0.9.1
FFC: 0.9.1
DOLFIN: 0.9.12
Jump in quick if there is anyth
10 matches
Mail list logo