Re: [Ffc] New regression test output format in FFC

2013-02-19 Thread Martin Sandve Alnæs
Both ways are on, so we can keep the old for a while to be safe. Martin Den 20. feb. 2013 07:41 skrev "Kristian Ølgaard" følgende: > On 19 February 2013 21:55, Anders Logg wrote: > > Very nice. This is the proper way to do it. > > Agree, is it switched on as default in the tests already? If not

Re: [Ffc] New regression test output format in FFC

2013-02-19 Thread Kristian Ølgaard
On 19 February 2013 21:55, Anders Logg wrote: > Very nice. This is the proper way to do it. Agree, is it switched on as default in the tests already? If not, just go ahead. Kristian > -- > Anders > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:54:10PM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: >> I've implemented a

Re: [Ffc] New regression test output format in FFC

2013-02-19 Thread Anders Logg
Very nice. This is the proper way to do it. -- Anders On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:54:10PM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > I've implemented a regression test output format that includes the > hierarchial structure of the forms, written as .json files (with a > limited feature set, not a

[Ffc] New regression test output format in FFC

2013-02-19 Thread Martin Sandve Alnæs
I've implemented a regression test output format that includes the hierarchial structure of the forms, written as .json files (with a limited feature set, not a lot of code), and gives us a more structured and easier to read output. The lack of a counter also means the diffs will be robust w.r.t. a