Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:32:23AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 09:17:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 A

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wednesday 09 December 2009 09:17:17 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800,

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:09:56PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 A

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:56:51AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, J

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:39:17 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Ande

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:25:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, J

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:13:20 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > > > > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (an

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Wednesday 09 December 2009 01:59:58 Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > > > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (and parts of UFL). Both > > > have grown out of hand and with limited

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:52:38PM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (and parts of UFL). Both > > have grown out of hand and with limited resources (like Martin and > > Johan leaving for other ventures) w

Re: [Ffc] Current developments

On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:09:09 Anders Logg wrote: > We're working on simplifying the FFC code (and parts of UFL). Both > have grown out of hand and with limited resources (like Martin and > Johan leaving for other ventures) we need to make the codebase easier > to maintain. > > As part of th

[Ffc] Current developments

We're working on simplifying the FFC code (and parts of UFL). Both have grown out of hand and with limited resources (like Martin and Johan leaving for other ventures) we need to make the codebase easier to maintain. As part of this, we've made some changes to how UFL and FFC handle the preprocess