On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:15:31PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
>> > The buildbot is broken after yesterday's release. The release script
>> > was partly
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
> The buildbot is broken after yesterday's release. The release script
> was partly broken so I ended up redoing the release a couple of timees
> before everything worked.
>
> The strange thing now is that the tests work fine locally in my
> repo
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
> Anyone knows what's up with the maverick buildbot for FFC? It reports
> strange errors:
>
> http://fenicsproject.org:8080/builders/ffc-maverick-i386/builds/245/steps/ffc%20check/logs/error.log
>
> It works on my laptop and on the other buildbots
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:46:53AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Johan Hake wrote:
>> > On Wednesday May 18 2011 14:35:47 Anders Logg wrote:
>> >> In the Debian package?
>
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> In a fresh dorsal stable build of FEniCS, I get the following from FFC
> (through PyDOLFIN):
>
> Calling FFC just-in-time (JIT) compiler, this may take some time.
> check 2 {FiniteElement('Discontinuous Lagrange', Cell('triangle',
> Spa
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Wednesday May 18 2011 14:35:47 Anders Logg wrote:
>> In the Debian package?
>
> Definiately.
I can patch the Debian package and the other binary packages.
>> Or should we make a 0.9.11-1 (or should it be -2)?
Please don't use a version nu
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC and
> DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements to UFL, FFC caching,
> and there have been a good number of DOLFIN bugs fixes. New version
> numbers would be:
>
> U
Hi,
Martin made me aware of the following error on the buildbot:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics-src/ffc/test/unit/misc/test.py",
line 275, in testPoisson
jit(a0, options)
File
"/home/buildbot/buildbots/main/fenics/lib/python2.6/site-packages
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:47:42PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:13:05PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 22
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 05:38 PM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:13:05PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>>>>
>>>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:13:05PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>> > Why is the FFC buildbot failing?
>> >
>> > The tests run fine on my laptop
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:13:05PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>> > Why is the FFC buildbot failing?
>> >
>> > The tests run fine on my laptop
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> Why is the FFC buildbot failing?
>
> The tests run fine on my laptop and bzr says my branch is up-to-date.
I don't know but I got the same error as the buildbot on my laptop.
Have you looked at the error.log:
http://fenicsproject.org:8080/bui
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Kristian Oelgaard
wrote:
> On 22 June 2010 13:07, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Kristian Oelgaard
>> wrote:
>>> On 21 June 2010 23:16, Kent Andre wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Strange. I used d
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Kristian Oelgaard
wrote:
> On 21 June 2010 23:16, Kent Andre wrote:
>>
>> Strange. I used dorsal to compile the dev versions of the various
>> packages. Dolfin, ffc, and sfc are only a few days old.
>
> I removed fenics-syfi and cloned a new one, then I got a lit
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On May 18 2010, Johannes Ring wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> See this bug report:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581897
>>
>> Does FFC require DOLFIN?
>
> Only when usin
Hi,
See this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581897
Does FFC require DOLFIN? Is it only dolfin_utils that is required? If
so, maybe there should be a separate package python-dolfin-utils in
Debian and let python-ffc depend on this package?
Johannes
_
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> As soon as the buildbot is green, I'm planning to make a new release
> of FFC (0.9.2, including the just pushed bug fix) and DOLFIN 0.9.7.
It's green! (It started to build again on hardy-i386 because the
'force' button was pushed.)
Johannes
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> All buildbots for FFC are green except Windows. I assume some old
> installation is not being correctly overwritten and needs to be
> cleaned out:
>
> from ffc.compiler import compile_form, compile_element
> ImportError: cannot import name co
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> Johannes, there seems to be a problem with the buildbots.
> They are failing for FFC with the message
>
> from ffc.compiler import compile
> ImportError: cannot import name compile
>
> I had the same on my machine just now and I fixed it by re
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:21:18PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 09:32:03PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> >> It would be good to make a release of DOLFIN/FFL/UFL next week with the
>> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
