hi everybody,
I'm a newbie so be easy on me please :)
I have such a conf file:
...
before = common.conf
[Definition]
_daemon = smbd
failregex = ^%(__prefix_line)sAuth: \[SMB[0-9]\,\(null\)\] user
\[.+\]\\\[.+\] at \[.+\] with \[NTLMv2\] status
\[NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD\] workstation \[.+
Hi guys
I run off centOS 9 and have noticed a weird "misbehavior" and I wonder
if you guys could confirm you have seen it too and/or perhaps would try
to reproduce.
I don't know inner working of f2b, don't know the code so I cannot say
when, under what circumstances f2b creates 'table' but..
Hi guys.
my _fail2ban_ shows no banned ips at all, yet there are
entries in nftables, eg.:
-> $ fail2ban-client status dovecot
Status for the jail: dovecot
|- Filter
| |- Currently failed: 0
| |- Total failed: 0
| `- Journal matches: _SYSTEMD_UNIT=dovecot.service
`- Actions
|- C
On 08/09/2023 19:50, Tim Boneko via Fail2ban-users wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 08.09.2023 um 15:42 +0200 schrieb lejeczek via
how can that be?
Hello L.!
Welcome to the list! We can help you more specific with more specific
information. That IP address is from the 10.x.x.x range which is not
reso
Hi guys.
With banaction as above my _fail2ban_ inject rules into
_default_ zone - is this by design or I misconfigured my setup?
The way _fail2ban_ does it for me seems to me, is broken,
defeats the purpose - no?
_zone_ when in use will(should) use a given iface(s) - in my
case it's a zone wit
Hi guys.
I'm on Centos 10 with Fail2Ban v1.1.0 and I am seeing
peculiar misbehavior?
I do:
-> $ fail2ban-client unban 10.3.1.10
I search for IP, with a script
-> $ __fail2ban | __grepColorIt 10.3.1
there is no IP of that subnet, that fail2ban reports back,
yet...
-> $ firewall-cmd --direct --
