Re: [Fail2ban-users] can't make ignoreregex working

2015-02-09 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
Please, show the complete command line for fail2ban-regex, which should include a 3rd argument. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Cristiano Nuzzo wrote: > Hi everybody, I'm using guacamole.conf to ban user that fails login, > > this is my guacamole.conf: > > # > # Author: Steven Hiscocks > # > >

Re: [Fail2ban-users] can't make ignoreregex working

2015-02-09 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
Mon Feb 09 19:38:41 2015 > > | 217.200.201.249 Mon Feb 09 19:38:42 2015 > > | 217.200.201.249 Mon Feb 09 19:38:43 2015 > > | 151.52.140.102 Mon Feb 09 20:08:31 2015 > > | 151.52.140.102 Mon Feb 09 20:08:40 2015 > > | 151.52.140.102 Mon Feb 09 20:08:44 2

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Unable to find a corresponding IP address for ::1

2015-02-16 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
Sebastian, Please use an up-to-date fail2ban version. You can find current packages here: http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Downloads We cannot support 0.8.6. On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:08 PM, sebast...@debianfan.de < sebast...@debianfan.de> wrote: > Hello, > > i have a problem with fail

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Fail2ban-p2p

2015-06-19 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi! This looks interesting. I do remember this project being mentioned, indeed. Could you describe the architecture and how it relates to fail2ban? Is it in use? Thank you! On 19 Jun 2015 08:48, "H Dubbs" wrote: > Hello all, > > A few guys at my uni wrote a small program about 2 years ago, wh

[Fail2ban-users] fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?)

2015-07-29 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi team, I just finished implementing a simple tool that monitors fail2ban.log for ban/unbans, and uses zeromq to distribute that information to zeromq subscribers. i know there are other ideas out there for this need, but zeromq looked appropiate enough, and is well supported on Debian/Ubuntu fo

[Fail2ban-users] Fwd: fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?)

2015-07-30 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Sorry, clicked reply instead of reply-all. -- Forwarded message -- From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?) To: Darac Marjal Hi! Replies inline. On Thu, Jul 30,

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?)

2015-07-30 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
give me more details on your REST solution? On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Sean DuBois wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:38:24PM -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman > wrote: > > >Hi team,

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?)

2015-07-30 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Sean DuBois wrote: > I ran into this same issue and ended up putting a little REST server on > top of fail2ban (using the socket that fail2ban-client uses) and if > something is banned on one server hit the API of all its siblings. > > So, each fail2ban instance

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?)

2015-07-30 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Thank you! Now I have an excuse to learn golang :) On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Sean DuBois wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:25:40PM -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: > > I first thought about this a long time ago: > > > > > http://blogs.buanzo.c

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban zeromq distribution (fail2ban-cluster?)

2015-07-31 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > why not to just push it into public location and share a link? ;) > The list will get a link next week. Polishing means that it will be something better than a proof-of-concept, and actually a good initial base for contributions. > I

[Fail2ban-users] fail2ban-zmq-tools aka fail2ban-cluster get the package!

2015-08-10 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi everyone, I just made this file available: https://mx5.mailfighter.net/fail2ban-zmq-tools-0.1-closedtesting.tgz If you are interested in joining the testing group, you need to email me, and ask me for a TOKEN. More details in the NOTES, README and fail2ban-cluster.conf files. What is fail2ban

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban-zmq-tools aka fail2ban-cluster get the package!

2015-08-10 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Oh, if you downloaded the package in the last 5 minutes, please re-download. I had forgotten to include a very important line in a .py file ;) On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman < bua...@buanzo.com.ar> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just made thi

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban-cluster(zmq-tools)

2015-08-12 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Monitor,Publisher and Subscriber log a startup message. Try: grep -E 'monitor|subscriber' /var/log/messages On 12 Aug 2015 2:17 pm, "Harrison Johnson" wrote: > That makes perfect sense line 6 of configparsing.py clearly says its > looking for fail2ban-cluster.conf I feel like an idiot. And I am

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban-cluster(zmq-tools)

2015-08-12 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
.mailfighter.net |ssh|Ban|202.195.160.11 Aug 12 13:53:27 mx5 /fail2ban-subscriber.py[3382]: fail2ban-zmq-tools Subscriber: Got broadcast message: mx2.mailfighter.net |ssh|Unban|43.229.53.81 On 12 Aug 2015 2:21 pm, "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" wrote: > Monitor,Publisher and S

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban-cluster(zmq-tools)

2015-08-12 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
ervice file so I can auto start fail2ban cluster. I will post them to the > list if any one wants to use them, most everybody hates systemd so it is > probably a moot point. > > Thanks for the help > Harry > > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 15:23 -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wr

[Fail2ban-users] fail2ban-zmq-tools (aka fail2ban-cluster) repository now open

2015-08-16 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi, to keep this message short: https://github.com/buanzo/fail2ban-zmq-tools And the THANKS: https://github.com/buanzo/fail2ban-zmq-tools/blob/master/THANKS ;) -- ___ Fail2ban-

Re: [Fail2ban-users] AMQP/MQTT

2015-10-02 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
No, but I implemented one using zeromq, check this out: https://github.com/buanzo/fail2ban-zmq-tools On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Abdul Hakeem wrote: > Hello, > > > > Does anyone have an info on an AMQP or MQTT module compatible with > Fail2ban ? > > > > Regards, > > Abdul Hakeem > > >

Re: [Fail2ban-users] An issue with a dateformat

2015-10-28 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Additional info I forgot to add: Day,Month and Hour do not use zero-padding (that is, 1 is 1, not 01) Minute DOES use padding (5 -> 05) On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman < bua...@buanzo.com.ar> wrote: > Hi! For different reasons, I cannot update

[Fail2ban-users] An issue with a dateformat

2015-10-28 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi! For different reasons, I cannot update a particular server to latest fail2ban, so I am editing datedetector.py: LOG EXAMPLE: 22/10/2015 14:56:43.624 - Unknown User or Access Restriction block for cindy in POP3 from x.x.x.x Code: # 28/10/2015 7:08:50.478

Re: [Fail2ban-users] An issue with a dateformat

2015-10-28 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
n but know enough about regex's to > be dangerous) > > Nick > > On 2015-10-28 16:04, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: > >> Hi! For different reasons, I cannot update a particular server to >> latest fail2ban, so I am editing datedetector.py: >> >&

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Blocking portscanning

2016-01-05 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
There an extremely valuable proactive reason. If you detect portscans or attacks or abuses on one of your network devices, you might wish to proactively share that info with the rest of your servers or devices. The good thing about open source software, is that the software does not specify WHY yo

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Blocking portscanning

2016-01-05 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
I have a filter ready to do this, I have been using it for a couple of years now. It requires the SNORT ids configured on the system, using syslog output. Works like a charm. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Perry E. Metzger > wrote: > > On

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Blocking portscanning

2016-01-05 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
The internet is huge. If one, 100 or 10 thousand hosts want to proactively block scanners, it will not harm statistics. On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:56:41 -0500 Alex wrote: > > That IP doesn't exist. I can't think of any reason a legitimate >

Re: [Fail2ban-users] undersatnding fail2ban log entries

2016-04-09 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
1) it is an attempt. Ban happens according to your configuration maxretry, etc. 2) fakegooglebot ignores it because that IP is indeed a REAL Google bot . On 9 Apr 2016 5:01 am, "Anthony Griffiths" wrote: > I'm running fail2ban-0.9.3-1.el6.1 on centos 6 and in the fail2ban log are > some entries

Re: [Fail2ban-users] getting IP address out of postfix logline that doesn't have the IP ?

2016-04-13 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Configure it to reject instead of discard. On 13 Apr 2016 10:55 am, wrote: > > I'm assuming you don't want to let the sender know that you detected the > virus. > > yep > > > there's no reason to block the sender for subsequent deliveries in your > firewall either, as the sender will notice that

[Fail2ban-users] fail2ban talk in Buenos Aires, this Saturday

2016-06-01 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi all! I will be talking about fail2ban and fail2ban-zmq-tools at the ANDSEC security conference in Buenos Aires this weekend. If anyone is around (I know for a fact there are many fail2ban users in Argentina and Uruguay), ping me. www.andsec.org fail2ban rules!!! Cheers, Buanzo. -

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Blocking portscans

2017-02-20 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
I used to use psad as well, but perl was misbehaving, and sometimes psad would consumme to much CPU. In such context, I prefer Snort IDS to consumme my cpu :) On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:28 PM, wrote: > Hmmm On second thought, perhaps that suggestion wasn't helpful > either. Apologies for th

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Good guide for fail2ban + nftables

2019-03-15 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hi. If you have a good nftables setup already, you could use an ipset for fail2ban integration. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:19 AM Paul Fontenot wrote: > Good morning, > > Is there a good guide for implementing fail2ban with nftables? I've > searched online - admittedly my Google Fu is not so go

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Client and Server on different machines

2019-06-17 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
I wrote fail2ban-zmq-tools for this purpose. check our github.org/buanzo/fail2ban-zmq-tools On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 19:12 Spon Spon via Fail2ban-users < fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I have several servers and one firewall, therefore I need to run on each > server a fail2ban clien

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Client and Server on different machines

2019-06-17 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Sorry, github is .com https://github.com/buanzo/fail2ban-zmq-tools On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 23:05 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: > I wrote fail2ban-zmq-tools for this purpose. > > check our github.org/buanzo/fail2ban-zmq-tools > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 19:12 Spo

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Client and Server on different machines

2019-06-18 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
onfigured to spread bans to your firewall from several servers. > Also written on zmq. > > murf > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:36 PM Antonio Leding wrote: > >> FYI - I think you meant *github.com <http://github.com>*… >> >> >> >> On Jun

Re: [Fail2ban-users] badips.com down for a while, alternatives?

2020-11-10 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Aounds like the API key, or header, is invalid. Sure it does not ask for an Authorization header? On Tue, Nov 10, 2020, 12:18 Robert Kudyba wrote: > > Do any of you use any alternatives to use with ipset or populate >> > /etc/hosts.deny TCP Wrappers? >> >> Here's another useful resource: https:

Re: [Fail2ban-users] [jmm] Mystery log entry

2021-04-14 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Seems like a log that contained a hostname instead of an IP? On Wed, Apr 14, 2021, 17:50 James Moe via Fail2ban-users < fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > fail2ban v0.10.4 > > Found in the log today: > 2021-04-14 07:24:17,861 fail2ban.ipdns [31473]: WARNING Unable to find a > corres

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Drop Established Connection on Ban

2021-05-03 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
As a long time mail server admin, I can confirm postfix is amazing, and has a wonderful ecosystem of tools to enhance different aspects. Other alternatives could be Courier-MTA by Sam Varshavshik, but the Postfix community is way more positive. On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:53 AM Kenneth Porter wrot

Re: [Fail2ban-users] lockout confined to user account?

2021-08-09 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
fail2ban works at IP level, not application level. No 'username'-level blocking. On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mat wrote: > I understand IP addresses banned as per filter/action criteria. Good. > Is it possible to ban just the user account so that this user can try > login from another IP? I

Re: [Fail2ban-users] lockout confined to user account?

2021-08-09 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Having said that, you can always create an action for your specific filter to disable the user account as well, but the details depend entirely on your system... On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:52 PM Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman < bua...@buanzo.com.ar> wrote: > fail2ban works at IP lev

Re: [Fail2ban-users] fail2ban for a range of IPs

2021-12-13 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Interesting. I have been testing crowdsec, too. And it's based around f2b. On Sat, Dec 11, 2021, 13:33 Mike wrote: > Good point. fail2ban isn't exactly the right tool for this. > > > There appears to be a project but I don't think it's maintained: > https://github.com/XaF/fail2ban-subnets >

[Fail2ban-users] Has anyone seen this Crowdsec related PR?

2022-12-28 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/pull/3407/files Sounds like a nice way of complementing both solutions ___ Fail2ban-users mailing list Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users

Re: [Fail2ban-users] www.fail2ban.org redirects to github.com/fail2ban/failban now

2023-09-25 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Cyril, I can run the wiki on my infrastructure if required. No load issues. On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, 13:25 Cyril Jaquier wrote: > Hi all, > > I see a constant traffic on www.fail2ban.org from bots since a month or > so that increase the load on my dedicated server that runs the > (outdated) wiki. >

[Fail2ban-users] Some help with ZImbra 9

2023-12-06 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Hello team, So, I have these kinds of lines on the zimbra 9 auth log: Dec 5 15:43:30 mx20 mailbox-log 2023-12-02 11:13:20,110 INFO [qtp1059063940-46725701://localhost:8080/service/soap/BatchRequest] [name= x...@xx.com;oip=1.2.3.4, 5.6.7.8;ua=zclient/9.0.0_GA_4564;soapId=612ef133;] account

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Can Fail2ban Send Commands to Network Firewall?

2024-02-10 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
you most certainly can do this by defining a set of custom actions for ban/unban, etc. check the other actions that fail2ban has included for examples On Sat, Feb 10, 2024, 20:31 Jon Forrest wrote: > > > On 2/10/2024 3:24 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * Jon Forrest [02-10-24 18:19]: > >> Let

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Help:The number of log files monitored

2024-02-14 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Wow. Sounds like a massive hosting. You might be better off creating either more servers or not concentrating log analysis that way. Regarding your specific query, I would claim the jail condition and the commands you use are naturally different. On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, 13:30 高井 進吾 via Fail2ban-user

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Fail2ban V1.1.0 from Github - question Regex

2024-05-20 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Use pyrex or any python compatible one. Also be mindful of interpreting the filter definitions in filter.d and using fail2ban-regex as testing ground. On Mon, May 20, 2024, 07:21 Maurizio Caloro via Fail2ban-users < fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hello > > Please i think the Ver

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Fail2ban V1.1.0 from Github - question Regex

2024-05-20 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
; > > > Please, after generate this syntax, no chance to include this to Fail2ban. > > From 4389 found 0 hits > > > > [Appl PyRex] > > NON-SMTP COMMAND from.\[+.\]:..after > CONNECT:.GET./.HTTP/1.1 > > NON-SMTP COMMAND from [64.62.197.214]:1

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Fail2ban V1.1.0 from Github - question Regex

2024-05-20 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
Howitt via Fail2ban-users < > fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net>: > >  You also need to give us a bit more help, like examples of the failed > log you are trying to match. > > BTW, why try to match a port with \w+ and not \d+? And why \w+?. > > On 20/05/2024 13:36

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Fail2ban V1.1.0 from Github - question Regex

2024-05-20 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
fail2ban-regex is what you need to use... trust me on this, I have a bit of experience with fail2ban. XD On Mon, May 20, 2024, 11:41 Maurizio Caloro wrote: > > > Am 20.05.2024 um 16:30 schrieb Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman < > bua...@buanzo.com.ar>: > >  &g

Re: [Fail2ban-users] Fail2ban V1.1.0 from Github - question Regex

2024-05-20 Thread Arturo &#x27;Buanzo' Busleiman
A tu servicio amigo. Enjoy fail2ban. You will succeed in learning it and stopping evil;) On Mon, May 20, 2024, 12:00 Maurizio Caloro wrote: > > > Am 20.05.2024 um 16:42 schrieb Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman < > bua...@buanzo.com.ar>: > >  > fail2ban-regex i