I hate that people now blithely email messages that have multi-Mb
attachments. This is facilitated by clients' ability to efficiently
download them. But my 2.7.2 exmh takes about a minute per 4Mb. Is there
a way to speed it up?
--
rick baartman,
Head, Beam Physics
Accelerator Division, TRIUMF
4
>I hate that people now blithely email messages that have multi-Mb
>attachments. This is facilitated by clients' ability to efficiently
>download them. But my 2.7.2 exmh takes about a minute per 4Mb. Is there
>a way to speed it up?
That seems rather slow. Like, way slower than the Ultra Sparc
Thanks Ken.
I'm embarrassed to say that haven't upgraded desktop in 10 years. I
have FC6 on a 32 bit machine.
--
rick baartman,
Head, Beam Physics
Accelerator Division, TRIUMF
4004 Wesbrook Mall
Vancouver, BC
V6T2A3
___
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-u
>I'm embarrassed to say that haven't upgraded desktop in 10 years. I
>have FC6 on a 32 bit machine.
Ahhh ... wow? Sadly, everyone ELSE has upgraded their desktops and
don't think sending 30 MB attachments as a problem. I don't know your
fiscal situation, but maybe an upgrade is in order? Also
In the message dated: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:35:51 -0500,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
were:
=> >I'm embarrassed to say that haven't upgraded desktop in 10 years. I
=> >have FC6 on a 32 bit machine.
=>
=> Ahhh ... wow? Sadly, everyone ELSE has upgraded their desktops and
Yep, my f
You guys are shaming me. Actually would be interested to know whether
you can login.
> From exmh-users-boun...@redhat.com Wed Jan 25 15:57:07 2017
>
> In the message dated: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:35:51 -0500,
> The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
> were:
> => >I'm embarrassed to say that