[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Matteo Bonora via Exim-users
Il 31/01/2025 10:53, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users ha scritto: Well, you've not said what version Exim you are running so I can only guess it's something modern.  You could split out to separate named-queues during reception, and have separate queue-runners.  Or you could run two totally separate

[exim] smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Matteo Bonora via Exim-users
Hello everyone, I have a remote_smtp transport configured to send messages using the same interface that originally received such message. All is working well a part from one specific case: defers. When messages are deferred due to termporary errors from the remote hosts, it happens that aft

[exim] Re: "No errors" in $spf_header_comment

2025-01-31 Thread Patrik Peng via Exim-users
On 30.01.2025 18:33, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote: libspf2 also comes with a command-line program (spfquery) - Perhaps Patrik can reproduce the issue with spfquery. $ echo "1.1.1.1"a...@many-spf.hp-mail-infra-test-01.ch helohost.com | spfquery -f - StartError Context: Failed to query M

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 31/01/2025 10:08, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: Splitting the messages in different queues is interesting though. Could you point me to some documentation on how to implement that? https://exim.org/exim-html-4.93/doc/html/spec_html/index.html Concept index. Named queues, and the "qu

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Matteo Bonora via Exim-users
Unfortunately I cannot do that... That would be detrimental for hosts which rate limits the connection number. We currently have "connection_max_messages = 20" Setting it to an higher value would get us blocked due to "too many messages in one connection". Setting it to a lower value we would

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 30/01/2025 18:34, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: Is there a way to disable or control this behavior? Try setting "connection_max_messages = 1" on the transport. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/list

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 31/01/2025 09:30, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: I'm open to alternatives ;) Well, you've not said what version Exim you are running so I can only guess it's something modern. You could split out to separate named-queues during reception, and have separate queue-runners. Or you could

[exim] Is anyone using Exim with OpenSSL v1.1.1 or earlier ?

2025-01-31 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
Is anyone using Exim with OpenSSL v1.1.1 or earlier ? Context: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3131 and the mailop list message below. (I still have a VM that can build Exim 4.98 with OpenSSL 1.O.2u but would not dare run it in listening mode.) Thanks, -- Andrew C. Aitchison

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:34:31PM +0100, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: > I have a remote_smtp transport configured to send messages using the same > interface that originally received such message. Please, post here configuration of this transport, and explain how outgoing interface is bo

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Matteo Bonora via Exim-users
Il 31/01/2025 15:05, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users ha scritto: Attenzione: Questa email arriva da un mittente insolito. Attenzione: Assicurati che sia qualcuno di cui ti fidi. On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:34:31PM +0100, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: I have a remote_smtp transport configu

[exim] Re: Is anyone using Exim with OpenSSL v1.1.1 or earlier ?

2025-01-31 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 31/01/2025 14:38, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: On 31/01/2025 11:35, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote: Is anyone using Exim with OpenSSL v1.1.1 or earlier ? There's a buildfarm system running 1.0.2g (Solaris 10) and another running 1.0.2t (Solaris 11). Any informant notes tha

[exim] Re: Is anyone using Exim with OpenSSL v1.1.1 or earlier ?

2025-01-31 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 31/01/2025 11:35, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote: Is anyone using Exim with OpenSSL v1.1.1 or earlier ? There's a buildfarm system running 1.0.2g (Solaris 10) and another running 1.0.2t (Solaris 11). -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## htt

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 31/01/2025 17:08, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: This transport is really very simple and the bonding is done by the "interface = $interface_address" line. It works perfectly in every case but the one I described. Commit 237b2df13410 looks relevant. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscript

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Leonardo Boselli via Exim-users
Why you have altered the original message? It is not fair and offensive. On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Matteo Bonora via Exim-users wrote: Il 31/01/2025 15:05, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users ha scritto: Attenzione: Questa email arriva da un mittente insolito. Attenzione: Assicurati che sia qualcuno d

[exim] Re: smtp transport, deferred messages and wrong interface

2025-01-31 Thread Matteo Bonora via Exim-users
Ehm... Sorry? If you are referring to the following 2 lines: Attenzione: Questa email arriva da un mittente insolito. Attenzione: Assicurati che sia qualcuno di cui ti fidi. They are simply a warning from our Email Security Gateway, added on top of messages, to alert the recipient about message