Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote on 14-05-24 00:04:
On 13/05/2024 17:02, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
Accordingly to the Googles' recent changes
https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126?visit_id=638483404863497961-2571982079
https://support.google.com/a/answer/175365?hl=en&ref_topic=1354753
On 14/05/2024 09:25, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
Since a mail can be forwarded several times before reaching its final
destination, it looks logical to put X-Forwarded header(s) at each hop [where
it was forwarded].
One might think so... but they don't actually say so. They do suggest ARC,
w
> My problem is that I'm aware a message is forwarded only at the routers level
> (the final destination e-address is taken from /etc/aliases or ~/.forward)
> and :at_start: option does not seems to work in transports
I'm not sure, but you can try:
In routers place the content you need into addre
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 01:41:28PM GMT, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote:
> > My problem is that I'm aware a message is forwarded only at the
> > routers level (the final destination e-address is taken from
> > /etc/aliases or ~/.forward) and :at_start: option does not seems
> > to work in transports
On 14/05/2024 18:12, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
Clearly this solution is only valid if the add_header action is
"lazily evaluated" i.e. delayed until actual delivery.
Not so. Look at the documentation on verifies and $address_data.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requir
Jeremy, Lena,
Thank you for your advises.
It perfectly works at ACL time. No side effects with my config detected so far.
Thanks!
A.
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote on 14-05-24 11:32:
On 14/05/2024 09:25, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
Since a mail can be forwarded several times before reac
Ian Z via Exim-users wrote on 14-05-24 19:12:
warn condition = ${if def:address_data}
add_header = :at_start:X-Forwarded-For: $address_data
Clearly this solution is only valid if the add_header action is
"lazily evaluated" i.e. delayed until actual delivery. Is that the
case?
Ia
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:32:22AM GMT, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> One might think so... but they don't actually say so. They do
> suggest ARC, which supplies essentially the same information (but
> they don't say "one or the other", which feels like half-baked
> guidance to me). I'd
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:39:26PM GMT, Anton wrote:
> you have two ACL rules, first one (verify recipient) "fills" the
> $address_data, the second rule (above) just checks if there is any
> data in the variable.
I forgot that routers can be separately run for verification only, as
Jeremy points
On 14/05/2024 23:09, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
Is there documentation for the "experimental ARC" code in exim?
In the experimental-spec.txt file there is documentation
for the facility. There isn't anything for the code, beyond
the actual source.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription conf
On Tue, 14 May 2024, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:32:22AM GMT, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
One might think so... but they don't actually say so. They do
suggest ARC, which supplies essentially the same information (but
they don't say "one or the other", whic
11 matches
Mail list logo
