Good Day!
I am running Exim 4.97. Trying to configure a vacation/out-of-office
autoreply. I have read a bunch of articles and examples from before and
after "tainting" was implemented. Alas, I am still confused as I build
the configuration.
Presently, I am having issues getting my router u
Dňa 10. 3. o 14:31 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users napísal(a):
That matches my code-diving. You can't use (transport) header manipulation
results in the transport's dkim-control options (but the changed values
are what gets signed, if any such headers are included in the definition
for the signatu
On 21/03/2024 07:23, Glenn Gregorec via Exim-users wrote:
vacationUser:
driver = redirect
domains =
${lookup{${lc:${domain}}}lsearch,ret=key{/usr/local/etc/exim/vacation-domains}}
local_parts =
${lookup{${lc:${local_part}@${domain}}}lsearch,ret=key{/
Op 20 mrt 2024, om 23:32 heeft Andrew C Aitchison het
volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, Marco van Tol via Exim-users wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I apologise if this has been handled before. I wasn’t sure what a quick
>> path in the FAQ would be to the answer for this.
>>
>> I have
On 21/03/2024 14:33, Marco van Tol via Exim-users wrote:
I have tried to find a routers config that will do this:
- try to deliver an address over smtp
- if the returned error is permanent, try the next router
I looked at the options for the smtp transport, the generic routing options and
the
Thank You for sharing your insight Jeremy! :-)
My intention was not to make assisting my issue harder. I was actually
trying to make it easier. I hope this helps.
I have tried several other lookups in the hopes of learning where I am
making a mistake. These did not work...
=== NOT WORKIN
On 21/03/2024 17:59, Glenn Gregorec via Exim-users wrote:
lookup yielded:
{BLF-CRYPT}$2a$05$xqWtKL1l.e3B98ISN0xbyOSROOIcMgAn6hIBZ7J9tHp/Wu28jvJfy::
So the "local_users" option setting is telling Exim to try to match the
local_part of the recipient to a local-part list which looks like
"{
