On Sun, 22 Oct 2023, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 07:03:19PM +0200, brunoc68 via Exim-users wrote:
>
> > h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:To:From:Sender:\
> > Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:\
> > Resent-Date:Resent-
> I think the PostgreSQL recommendation seems reasonable, but the doc leaves
> me with some questions/ambiguities.
>
> Mainly, that I'm having trouble parsing the documentation's explanation of
> dkim_sign_headers entries [0]. I can see 4 cases:
>
> * no prefix: sign the first instance of the na
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:18:05PM -0400, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > The modification to List-Id also leaves me wondering about
> > "Sender". I was previously under the impression mailing lists
> > used/modified this, but apparently not.
> My impression is that Sender is relatively obscure now.
Le 30/10/2023 à 11:09, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users a écrit :
On 30/10/2023 09:42, brunoc68 via Exim-users wrote:
Looking at the description of the transport option "size_addition", I
understand that the size of the message is sent by smtp before the
message is processed by the filter.
I am n
Dňa 3. novembra 2023 16:18:05 UTC používateľ Chris Siebenmann via Exim-users
napísal:
>(In practice it's very rare and generally alarming to see multiple
>instances of most headers.)
AFAIK it was way to trick MUAs to show different value in eg.
From: or Subject: fields. Without oversign, some M
