On 20/10/2023 13:19, brunoc68 via Exim-users wrote:
Le 20/10/2023 à 12:47, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users a écrit :
On 20/10/2023 10:45, brunoc68 via Exim-users wrote:
However, DKIM check fails (only) when the disclaimers are added.
Can you get a debug run for a sample small test message?
Also
Le 22/10/2023 à 13:44, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users a écrit :
Dear Jeremy,
I will send 3 email samples from the production server to your
private email address :
1. with disclaimer
2. without disclaimer but with DKIM signature
3. with disclaimer and DKIM signature
I received all three, and
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 07:03:19PM +0200, brunoc68 via Exim-users wrote:
> Public key :
> "v=DKIM1;
> k=rsa;
> p=MIIBITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ4AMIIBCQKCAQAzv3BvHbwGsHWZjnROtaNQMhzkL6yob0e7w2Sbatu3m7uwl89KnBbZBkmoxXsMcpK+f1XF7eahWm71f1hFqMP7cwQVwdQ/268NfXBt73zMcMgMqDPrVH5ptz93j/uTlIv9LNLbQww5fyYhzq
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 07:03:19PM +0200, brunoc68 via Exim-users wrote:
> h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:To:From:Sender:\
> Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:\
> Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:\
> Resent-Message-ID
On 22/10/2023 19:48, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
dkim-signing with the full set of
headers as per the exim default set above is broken
I'll take issue with "broken".
If (and there's the question) you think that a DKIM signature should
detect when a message has been modified, do you not think t
On 22/10/2023 20:04, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 22/10/2023 19:48, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
dkim-signing with the full set of
headers as per the exim default set above is broken
I'll take issue with "broken".
If (and there's the question) you think that a DKIM signature should
d
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 09:03:19PM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
wrote:
> > p=MIIBITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ4AMIIBCQKCAQAzv3BvHbwGsHWZjnROtaNQMhzkL6yob0e7w2Sbatu3m7uwl89KnBbZBkmoxXsMcpK+f1XF7eahWm71f1hFqMP7cwQVwdQ/268NfXBt73zMcMgMqDPrVH5ptz93j/uTlIv9LNLbQww5fyYhzqgdBID+KSTUg2ykZmhMcsKr5i
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:51:37PM +0100, Ray O'Donnell via Exim-users wrote:
> On 22/10/2023 20:04, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> > > dkim-signing with the full set of headers as per the exim
> > > default set above is broken
> > I'll take issue with "broken".
> > If (and there's the q
On 2023-10-22 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
> If (and there's the question) you think that a DKIM signature should
> detect when a message has been modified, do you not think that
> adding headers is a modification?
Hello,
I think it depends on which the header would be added. Some a
On 2023-10-23 Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
> I wonder what the fabulous debian configuration daoes in this respect.
We have a open bug about it
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939808 but have not
yet overridden exim's default.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to
10 matches
Mail list logo
