On 2023-06-03, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> Dňa 3. júna 2023 20:29:11 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via Exim-users
> napísal:
>
>>Nonetheless, I think that a pipeline should be aborted if you already
>>know that the far end is closed.
>
> IMO you are confused. That RCPT rejection was logged,
> > BTW, the RBLs are good not only for rejection, but eg. to
> > disable PIPELINING for suspicious hosts too...
>
> I've never used external blacklists (because I don't trust other
> people to make my spam decisions for me), but that would be a harmless
> use for them.
Another not too harmful us
Dňa 4. júna 2023 9:40:25 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via Exim-users
napísal:
>True. Indeed, the docs for delay say that SMTP output is, by default,
>flushed before the delay, even in pipelining mode, so now I no longer
>understand why exim doesn't detect the closed stream on the first
>delay
On 2023-06-04, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> But then there are RBLs which tracks botnets and/or login
> attempts. Have you enough capacity (a lot of servers/
> sensors/traps/... across of world) to identify them early?
> Or you identify them only after some amount of malicious
> attempts?
I ide
Dňa 4. júna 2023 13:54:49 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via
Exim-users napísal:
>I'm a small MTA, handling only relatives and one small sports club.
>So I'm not a particularly heavy target.
Perhaps you can be not target of targeted atrack, but...
Have you properly set SPF/DKIM/DMARC and have
Ahoj,
Dňa Fri, 21 Apr 2023 14:40:47 +0100 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
napísal:
> On 21/04/2023 13:13, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> > it can
> > be related to per_addr option
>
> per_addr can only be used in the rcpt acl.
> You'd possibly be able to just use count=1,
> if this was and event
On 2023-06-04, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> Dňa 4. júna 2023 13:54:49 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via
> Exim-users napísal:
>>I'm a small MTA, handling only relatives and one small sports club.
>>So I'm not a particularly heavy target.
> Have you properly set SPF/DKIM/DMARC and have not ba
On 2023-06-04, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> --===5177538003882154364==
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/UlU3IJ5lalsyNpEcaEewzpE";
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
>
> --Sig_/UlU3IJ5lalsyNpEcaEewzpE
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
