On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:28:50AM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
wrote:
> > > Why do you want to do it? What is bad with MUA's message-id?
> > You can look at this message's headers :-)
> I've looked, but found no answer what's bad. Probably domain is
> hashed. Maybe you want an e
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:29:51AM +0200, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> I have similar problem with not appropriate Message-ID domain part,
> i do it in MAIL ACL:
> warn conditions = ...
> remove_header = Reply-To : Message-ID
> set acl_m_mid = gen_new_MID
Dňa 10. 4. o 8:28 Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users napísal(a):
I've looked, but found no answer what's bad. Probably domain is hashed.
Maybe you want an explicit domain string?
The answer is in docs, search for details in add/remove headers, more
precise when they are removed/added.
I h
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 02:01:55PM -0700, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:04:14PM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
> wrote:
> > MUA should do it, and MTA may if message-id is missing.
>
> My question was about the data flow inside exim. For example, if I set
> an a
On 09/04/2024 20:08, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
At what point in the "life of the message" is the check for a
message-id header made, and at what point is one generated if missing?
While Exim is receiving the message off the wire (or stdin), after getting
all the headers and before starting on
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:04:14PM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
wrote:
> > At what point in the "life of the message" is the check for a
> > message-id header made, and at what point is one generated if
> > missing?
> MUA should do it, and MTA may if message-id is missing.
My questio
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:08:30PM -0700, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
> At what point in the "life of the message" is the check for a
> message-id header made, and at what point is one generated if missing?
MUA should do it, and MTA may if message-id is missing.
> I have a client MUA which gener
