[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-08 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 08/05/2024 09:44, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote: Rumour is that Exim 4.99 will be replaced Exim 5 Not in my opinion. Please do not assume that 4.99 will be the last of the 4. series. The next number after "99" is "100". -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (requi

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-08 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
On Wed, 8 May 2024, Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users wrote: Google has, for reasons unknown, prioritised Exim 3(!) in search results for *ages*. I don't trust Google for Exim searches without adding very specific additional keywords. Even searching for "exim4" result in Exim 3 docs on occasion.

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-08 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 12:01 AM Terry M. Roy via Exim-users < exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote: > > > The dev documentation site popped up first on my google search, proving > google is not always your friend. > > Google has, for reasons unknown, prioritised Exim 3(!) in search results for *ages*.

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-07 Thread Terry M. Roy via Exim-users
On 5/7/24 16:07, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote: We did update https://www.exim.org/howto/mailman21.html#exconf to cover detainting mailman for exim 4.96, but it seems that the changes did not reach https://dev.exim.org/howto/mailman21.html#exconf Thanks, Andrew, for the

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-07 Thread Terry M. Roy via Exim-users
On 5/7/24 15:41, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote: Do you have more than one list on the server? I think the 2nd arg for MM_WRAP is the list name, is that just "list" in your case? -- Ian I do. I've changed the exim config to reflect the changes made to the exim documentation and that seems to h

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-07 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
On Tue, 7 May 2024, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Tue, 7 May 2024, Terry M. Roy via Exim-users wrote: I assume that the Exim documentation has not been updated to reflect the tainted issue for the Mailman information. Would someone please be able to advise how the transport stanza should be rev

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-07 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
On Tue, 7 May 2024, Terry M. Roy via Exim-users wrote: Hello, Our server is set up for Mailman 2 exactly as outlined in the Exim documentation here: https://dev.exim.org/howto/mailman21.html#exconf (We do not do VERP or personalisation.) We just upgraded the server from Debian Bullseye to Bo

[exim] Re: Mailman 2 - Tainted Values

2024-05-07 Thread Ian Z via Exim-users
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:53:25PM GMT, Terry M. Roy via Exim-users wrote: > Our server is set up for Mailman 2 exactly as outlined in the Exim > documentation here: https://dev.exim.org/howto/mailman21.html#exconf > (We do not do VERP or personalisation.) > 2024-05-07 08:29:16 1s3Wmx-00A3UG-0N *