Quoting John Levine via Exim-users (exim-users@lists.exim.org):
> >That text is obsolete. There is no such text in RFC5321, and
> >CNAME-valued mail domains have long been OK. The sending MTA (its DNS
> >resolver) is expected to restart the MX lookup at the target of the
> >CNAME, and if no MX r
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, John Levine via Exim-users wrote:
It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users said:
That text is obsolete. There is no such text in RFC5321, and
CNAME-valued mail domains have long been OK. The sending MTA (its DNS
resolver) is expected to restart the MX lookup at the
On 12/1/23 16:50, John Levine via Exim-users wrote:
Just wondering, I'm pretty sure I sent mail to this list in the past.
Is the CNAME new?
It probably appeared when some systems were reshuffled, earlier this year.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users said:
>That text is obsolete. There is no such text in RFC5321, and
>CNAME-valued mail domains have long been OK. The sending MTA (its DNS
>resolver) is expected to restart the MX lookup at the target of the
>CNAME, and if no MX records are found, u
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 12:09:44AM -0500, John R Levine via Exim-users wrote:
> Oh, I see the problem. lists.exim.org is a CNAME for cumin.exim.org,
> and qmail is standard compliant per RFC 1123:
>
> 5.2.2 Canonicalization: RFC-821 Section 3.1
>
> The domain names that a Sender-
On 2023-12-01 John R Levine via Exim-users wrote:
> It appears that Jeremy Harris via Exim-users said:
[...]
> > Our log says that message was aimed at exim-us...@cumin.exim.org
> Oh, I see the problem. lists.exim.org is a CNAME for cumin.exim.org,
> and qmail is standard compliant per RFC 1123:
It appears that Jeremy Harris via Exim-users said:
On 11/29/23 15:51, John Levine via Exim-users wrote:
Strange but true, sending mail to this list via IPv6 does not work:
2023-11-29 10:35:50.715699500 new msg 271522
2023-11-29 10:35:50.715750500 info msg 271522: bytes 2558 from
qp 83701 uid
