[exim] Re: SSL Certificates

2024-03-19 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
 > On 20. Mar 2024, at 04:45, Jerry Stuckle via Exim-users > wrote: > Hi, all, > > I'm a noob with Exim and am trying to implement TLS on the POP3 port but am > running into problems. > > First of all, this is a test system on our local network to test Exim > configurations. It is not acce

[exim] Re: Replacing wildlsearch with query-style lookups?

2024-01-25 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users hat am > 25.01.2024 09:09 CET geschrieben: > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:36:04AM +0100, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users > wrote: > > The only solution so far I come up with that I can put singular > > senders and domains in

[exim] Replacing wildlsearch with query-style lookups?

2024-01-24 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
Hi, I want to move my file lookups to database lookups (mariadb). While it is no problem with some of those file lookups because they become simple SELECTs. But I have a problem with (n)wildlsearch. Because I just don't know how I could replace them. For example a sender-lookup for: ^.*@(.*\.)

[exim] Re: exim 4.97.1 exiqgrep - line mismatch => broke munin

2024-01-12 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
There is a tool for converting old message-ids to new ones. Or you wait until all messages with the old IDs are out of the queue. Best, Niels > On Jan 12, 2024, at 09:17, Cyborg via Exim-users > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Fedora pushed an exim 4.97.1 update last night and now exiqgrep -cz sh

[exim] Re: Any changes with retry-rules in exim 4.97?

2023-12-08 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users hat am > 08.12.2023 13:21 CET geschrieben: > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 8:02 PM Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users < > exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote: > > > > l...@lena.kiev.ua hat am 06.12.2023 08:00 CET geschrieben

[exim] Re: Any changes with retry-rules in exim 4.97?

2023-12-06 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> l...@lena.kiev.ua hat am 06.12.2023 08:00 CET geschrieben: > > > > >> But I would expect that a queue runner (I start exim with -q10m) > > >> in a future run would take these messages but it doesn't seem to happen. > > > > > > Do you see "Start queue run", "End queue run" in the mainlog? > >

[exim] Re: Any changes with retry-rules in exim 4.97?

2023-12-06 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> l...@lena.kiev.ua hat am 06.12.2023 08:00 CET geschrieben: > > > > >> But I would expect that a queue runner (I start exim with -q10m) > > >> in a future run would take these messages but it doesn't seem to happen. > > > > > > Do you see "Start queue run", "End queue run" in the mainlog? > >

[exim] Re: Any changes with retry-rules in exim 4.97?

2023-12-05 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
Schöne Grüße Niels > On Dec 5, 2023, at 15:46, Lena--- via Exim-users > wrote: > >  >> >>> It is like exim accepts the mail, puts it into the queue >>> and then nothing happens. > >> In the log I see for those messages: no immediate delivery: >> more than 10 messages received in one conne

[exim] Re: Any changes with retry-rules in exim 4.97?

2023-12-05 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Niels Kobschätzki hat am 23.11.2023 17:32 CET > geschrieben: > > I don't see anything in the change log but something feels off when I look at > the behavior of my mail-servers. I see mails in the queue that are lying > there for 8 hours and are not retried once or delivered at all. Even to

[exim] Any changes with retry-rules in exim 4.97?

2023-11-23 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
Hi! I don't see anything in the change log but something feels off when I look at the behavior of my mail-servers. I see mails in the queue that are lying there for 8 hours and are not retried once or delivered at all. Even to local mailboxes. When I do a forced delivery with "exim -M" they are

[exim] Taint-problem with local delivery

2023-09-11 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
Hi, we deliver locally mails to adresses like my_user/somefol...@ourdomain.com In the past this would deliver the mail to the folder "somefolder" of the user "my_user" without using any filters. We found out that this is broken nowadays because of taint. The involved router is: virtual_localus

[exim] Re: De-Tainting in a filter-file?

2023-07-25 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users hat am > 25.07.2023 09:07 CEST geschrieben: > > > > Jeremy Harris via Exim-users hat am 21.07.2023 > > 11:25 CEST geschrieben: > > > > > > On 21/07/2023 09:39, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote: > &g

[exim] Re: De-Tainting in a filter-file?

2023-07-25 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users hat am 21.07.2023 > 11:25 CEST geschrieben: > > > On 21/07/2023 09:39, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote: > > When I start to quote that it won't work. I tried '$h_From:' and wrapping > > ${address:$h_FROM:} and wr

[exim] Re: De-Tainting in a filter-file?

2023-07-21 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users hat am 21.07.2023 > 09:16 CEST geschrieben: First - thanks for your reply and help. I really appreciate it. > On 21/07/2023 07:47, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote: > > In exim 4.96 I have now the problem that this seems to be considered

[exim] Re: De-Tainting in a filter-file?

2023-07-21 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
> Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users hat am > 21.07.2023 08:47 CEST geschrieben: > > > Hi, > > I have a router for using local filter-files that looks like this: > > virtual_userfilter: > driver = redirect > domains = lsearch,ret=key;VIRTUAL_DOM

[exim] De-Tainting in a filter-file?

2023-07-21 Thread Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users
Hi, I have a router for using local filter-files that looks like this: virtual_userfilter: driver = redirect domains = lsearch,ret=key;VIRTUAL_DOMAINS_FILE no_check_local_user no_verify no_expn router_home_directory = LDAP_MAILBOX transport_home_directory = LDAP_MAILBOX require_fi