[exim] Re: "Regression Tests" for exim config?

2024-12-15 Thread Andreas Barth via Exim-users
* Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users (exim-users@lists.exim.org) [241215 16:49]: > The exim source includes a test suite in exim/test which automates > doing this for multiple configs. There will be parts of that you > *could* cannibalize, but definitely a sledgehammer. Source sounds like a good id

[exim] "Regression Tests" for exim config?

2024-12-15 Thread Andreas Barth via Exim-users
Hi, I'd like to have some kind of regression tests for my exim config (at least the different delivery actions), so that I make sure to not break working configurations. I.e. I want to have some tests defined like "mail to a@b should be delivered to lmtp to c@d" (or whatever else makes sense). (I

[exim] Re: Certificate problem

2023-11-25 Thread Andreas Barth via Exim-users
* Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (exim-users@lists.exim.org) [231017 13:00]: > To be on the safe side: the the permission on the *whole* path (e.g. > using `namei -l …`), the cert and key file must be readable by the Exim > runtime user or group. If you use the cert as a client (during > transp

[exim] Re: Exim Zero Day?

2023-10-01 Thread Andreas Barth via Exim-users
* Rainer Dorsch via Exim-users (exim-users@lists.exim.org) [231001 15:02]: > Am Samstag, 30. September 2023, 10:34:14 CEST schrieb Andrew C Aitchison via > Exim-users: > > Yesterday Heiko posted > > https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2023/q3/254 > > in one of the security lists. > > For me, it

[exim] Re: tainted uux transport

2023-07-31 Thread Andreas Barth via Exim-users
Hi, had been some time since I tried that last, so if my remarks are not useful I'm sorry. * Randy Bush via Exim-users (exim-users@lists.exim.org) [230731 18:57]: > >> 2023-07-30 14:23:11 1qQ7KA-000BIX-27 ** f...@foo.com R=force_uucp T=uux: > >> Tainted > >> arg 4 for uux transport command: '