I run with 4.94.2 with no issues.
I tried to load a new server with 4.98 using the same configs and same
hosting domains, and email is rejected with the subject message. I see
also ... "Could not complete sender verify"
If I swing back to the chassis with 4.94.2, emails flows again as expecte
On 2024-07-30 Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
> I get the impressionexpect that most exim-users list readers find my
> occasional posts on TLS in SMTP more useful than not.
[...]
FWIW I do [find them useful].
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other f
On 2024-07-30 Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
> I get the impressionexpect that most exim-users list readers find my
> occasional posts on TLS in SMTP more useful than not.
[...]
FWIW I do.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grate
On 2024-07-30 at 05:07:03 UTC-0400 (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:07:03 +0100)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On 30/07/2024 07:40, xqm2018--- via Exim-users wrote:
In the exim advanced configuration manager
I've no idea what that is...
I believe that's what cPanel calls its to
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 01:17:00PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 30/07/2024 12:52, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> > *If* I extended the config to allow admins to set the OpenSSL option
> > SSL_OP_IGNORE_UNEXPECTED_EOF (and an equivalent gnutls option if I can
> > find
On 30/07/2024 12:52, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
*If* I extended the config to allow admins to set the OpenSSL option
SSL_OP_IGNORE_UNEXPECTED_EOF (and an equivalent gnutls option if I can
find one) which ignores this detection, would you accept it into the
exim code base ?
Probabl
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:44:17AM +0100, Bernard Quatermass via Exim-users
wrote:
> > Exim really should be updated to ignore OpenSSL's truncation
> > detection, I don't recall whether that even already happened and the
> > OP is running an older version?
>
> I rather think postfix is the codeb
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, Bernard Quatermass via Exim-users wrote:
On 29/07/2024 03:18, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
wrote:
BUT in the log, I get the following message:
H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [142.251.16.2
2024-07-30 14:07:55 1sYg1a-0006UBE-1Zcn H=mail-qv1-f52.google.com
[209.85.219.52]:43452 Warning: "SpamAssassin as akasotech detected message as
NOT spam (1.3)"
2024-07-30 14:07:55 1sYg1a-0006UBE-1Zcn <= sim...@growthmatessagency.com
H=mail-qv1-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]:43452 P=esmtp
On 30/07/2024 07:40, xqm2018--- via Exim-users wrote:
In the exim advanced configuration manager
I've no idea what that is...
SRS rewriting the sender has been enabled, but when the automatic forwarding of
emails fails> and needs to be returned to the original sender,
Do you mean "a bounc
On 29/07/2024 03:18, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
BUT in the log, I get the following message:
H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [142.251.16.26] TLS error on
connection (recv): The TLS connection was no
Section: PREROUTERS
send_via_ses:
driver = manualroute
domains = ! +local_domains : ! +manualmx_domains
.ifdef SRSENABLED
# if outbound, and forwarding has been done, use an alternate transport
transport = ${if eq {$local_part@$domain} \
{$original_local_part@$original_do
12 matches
Mail list logo