[exim] best practice on checking local virtual users before delivering (dsearch /srv/vmail or mysql lookup)

2024-07-17 Thread Emilio Augusto Lazo Zaia via Exim-users
Hello people, I'm using exim 4.96 from Debian bookworm. I have some questions regarding verifying local virtual users before deliverying messages. This is my local_user router: local_user:  debug_print = "R: local_user for $local_part@$domain"  driver = accept  domains = +local_domains # chec

[exim] Re: Correct way to verify $dkim_verify_status

2024-07-17 Thread Dominic Preston via Exim-users
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 14:56, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users < exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote: > On 17/07/2024 14:11, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote: > > The docs suggest I am allowed to test the dkim_status condition in a DATA > > ACL though? > > You must be running an old Exim version. >

[exim] Re: Correct way to verify $dkim_verify_status

2024-07-17 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 17/07/2024 14:11, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote: The docs suggest I am allowed to test the dkim_status condition in a DATA ACL though? You must be running an old Exim version. Docs for previous versions are on the same website. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (

[exim] Re: "cannot parse spamd" after rspamd 3.8 -> 3.9 upgrade

2024-07-17 Thread Olaf Hopp (SCC) via Exim-users
On 7/17/24 10:34 AM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: On 17/07/2024 07:43, Kai Bojens via Exim-users wrote: This doesn't look good, IMHO. It certainly doesn't make me feel like putting any effort into supporting it.  Perhaps some other developer will step up. the cause of the problem was

[exim] Re: Correct way to verify $dkim_verify_status

2024-07-17 Thread Dominic Preston via Exim-users
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 13:40, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users < exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote: > Decide exactly what semantics you want, and look into "forany", "forall", > "inlist" and so on. Or use the "dkim_status" ACL condition, if that does > what you need. > Hmm, so now I tried checking th

[exim] Re: Correct way to verify $dkim_verify_status

2024-07-17 Thread Dominic Preston via Exim-users
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 13:40, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users < exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote: > On 17/07/2024 13:08, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote: > > I was looking for the best way to check the value of $dkim_verify_status > > and came across this page: > > > https://www.exim.org/exim-ht

[exim] Correct way to verify $dkim_verify_status

2024-07-17 Thread Dominic Preston via Exim-users
Hello, I was looking for the best way to check the value of $dkim_verify_status and came across this page: https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-dkim_spf_srs_and_dmarc.html Within it I see: warn condition = ${if eq {$dkim_verify_status}{pass}} Am I right in thinkin

[exim] Re: Correct way to verify $dkim_verify_status

2024-07-17 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 17/07/2024 13:08, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote: I was looking for the best way to check the value of $dkim_verify_status and came across this page: https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-dkim_spf_srs_and_dmarc.html Within it I see: warn condition = ${if

[exim] Re: "cannot parse spamd" after rspamd 3.8 -> 3.9 upgrade

2024-07-17 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 17/07/2024 07:43, Kai Bojens via Exim-users wrote: This doesn't look good, IMHO. It certainly doesn't make me feel like putting any effort into supporting it. Perhaps some other developer will step up. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://l

[exim] Re: "cannot parse spamd" after rspamd 3.8 -> 3.9 upgrade

2024-07-17 Thread Ian Z via Exim-users
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:43:00AM GMT, Kai Bojens via Exim-users wrote: > The rspamd developer answered: > "Exim support of Rspamd is just broken I would say. Nobody actually > takes care about legacy SA protocol support and nobody should (as we > have JSON+HTTP or milter protocol being fully su