[exim] Re: missing message-id flow

2024-04-10 Thread Ian Z via Exim-users
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:28:50AM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote: > > > Why do you want to do it? What is bad with MUA's message-id? > > You can look at this message's headers :-) > I've looked, but found no answer what's bad. Probably domain is > hashed. Maybe you want an e

[exim] Re: missing message-id flow

2024-04-10 Thread Ian Z via Exim-users
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:29:51AM +0200, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > I have similar problem with not appropriate Message-ID domain part, > i do it in MAIL ACL: > warn conditions = ... > remove_header = Reply-To : Message-ID > set acl_m_mid = gen_new_MID

[exim] Re: missing message-id flow

2024-04-10 Thread Slavko via Exim-users
Dňa 10. 4. o 8:28 Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users napísal(a): I've looked, but found no answer what's bad. Probably domain is hashed. Maybe you want an explicit domain string? The answer is in docs, search for details in add/remove headers, more precise when they are removed/added. I h