On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:26:39PM +, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
> Secondly, is there really any reason nowadays for restricting % and ! ?
>
> The last time I saw a % address was in 1995, and the last time I saw a
> ! address was in 1994. (And of course, when I did see them, they
Following an idle-moment post on mailop, I wonder:
>From the default config:
---
acl_check_rcpt:
accept hosts = :
denydomains = +local_domains
local_parts = ^[.] : ^.*[@%!/|]
message = Restricted characters in address
denydomains = !+local_domains
Dňa 9. marca 2024 15:38:43 UTC používateľ Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
napísal:
>However, the text of the headers (and body) of the message used as input
>for the various hashes and signatures of the DKIM signing *is* the
>output of any transport filter (this adds significant coding and cpu
>ove
On 09/03/2024 09:08, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
Dňa 9. marca 2024 7:15:17 UTC používateľ Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
napísal:
The DKIM section of "DKIM, SPF, SRS and DMARC" starts with
| Exim’s DKIM implementation allows for
|
| 1. Signing outgoing messages: This function is implemen
Dňa 9. marca 2024 7:15:17 UTC používateľ Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
napísal:
>The DKIM section of "DKIM, SPF, SRS and DMARC" starts with
>| Exim’s DKIM implementation allows for
>|
>| 1. Signing outgoing messages: This function is implemented in the
>|SMTP transport. It can co-e
