On Sat, 25 Jun 2022, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
Not sure if I'm missing the boat or what but - for one of my users to send
email - they must use mail Submission port 587 - and nothing else. That's on
a server that only listens on port 587. This works fine until a user "shares"
their pas
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:00:40 +0200 Kirill Miazine via Exim-users
napísal:
> According to docs, AuthBL is both:
> "AuthBL is basically that: a collection of bots known to use stolen
> credentials or authentication bruteforce."
Yes, my mistake. I didn't check its docs, only my notes and me
On 26/06/2022 08:19, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
[ I should document CVE-2021-38371:
before exim 4.95 exim probably was exposed to a man-in-the
middle attack on STARTTLS when *sending* email, though it
it is not clear how it could have been exploited.
Indeed, nobody that I am
Seems I need to do more learning
On 6/26/22 9:19 AM, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2022, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
Not sure if I'm missing the boat or what but - for one of my users to
send email - they must use mail Submission port 587 - and nothing
else
I'm very interested in what you are doing.
My thinking along country blocking for the submission of email addresses
is...
Subscribers have their data in a database. They have a properly secured
web access system to that database for account management purposes
(change their password - etc).
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 03:52:56PM +0200, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
> > I am curious. Why do you not allow your users to user port 465 ?
> > RFC 8314 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8314#section-7.3
> > repurposed this as a mail *submission* port with Implicit TLS.
>
> Reading RF
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 26 Jun 2022 15:52:56 +0200 Mark Elkins via Exim-users
napísal:
> urd 465/tcp smtps ssmtp # URL Rendesvous Directory
> for SSM / smtp protocol over TLS/SSL
> igmpv3lite 465/udp smtps ssmtp # IGMP over UDP for SSM
>
> submission 587/tcp
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 04:30:14PM +0200, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> > it seems
> > there is confusion over the use of this port. I've always assumed
> > that some MTA clients may use port 465 - rather than using port 25.
>
> Not MAY, they SHOULD (if they support it), the 587 is as fallback
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
Seems I need to do more learning
On 6/26/22 9:19 AM, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2022, Mark Elkins via Exim-users wrote:
Not sure if I'm missing the boat or what but - for one of my users to send
email - t
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:41:47 -0400 Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users
napísal:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 04:30:14PM +0200, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
>
> > Not MAY, they SHOULD (if they support it), the 587 is as fallback
> > for old clients only, the 25/tcp is deprecated for MUAs for
> >
Am 24.06.22 um 08:08 schrieb Slavko via Exim-users:
That is pretty simple, just add this IP to firewall's DROP. To automatize
its banning, use fail2ban. But be aware, that they will often try from
other IP soon. I have 100 - 800 different IPs per day, most of them
has only one attempt allowed her
Am 24.06.22 um 22:45 schrieb Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users:
Best way here is to add your users primary country to the auth_advertise_hosts
list. Could be quite a IP list, but you can store it in a file if you want, by
using a lookup condition.
Then if they travel to a non-approved country, t
I loaded 4.96 on a FBSD box , I learned that it insisted on pcre2 . So
far so good , I got that corrected in my Local / Makefile .
It seemed to be working fine in a test environment , that is , until I
noticed that my main server , running 4.94.2 cannot speak to it .
4.94.2 logs: Operation time
13 matches
Mail list logo
