Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> W B Hacker, 2010-06-16 13:24:
>
> (sorry for repost)
No sweat.
>
>> There is no MX RR for relay.rzone.de Exim appears to have found it by its
>> A RR.
>
> You seem to think relay.rzone.de is the rcpt domain of the message the
> OP had a message for.
I think that is th
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sebastian Tennant
wrote:
> Quoth Sebastian Tennant :
>> Try as I might, I can't get any ACLs to work.
>
> Many thanks to both respondents. Noted and understood.
>
> May I suggest that the chapter in the manual on regular expressions be changed
> to highlight the
Quoth Sebastian Tennant :
> Try as I might, I can't get any ACLs to work.
Many thanks to both respondents. Noted and understood.
May I suggest that the chapter in the manual on regular expressions be changed
to highlight the fact that Exim cannot handle delimiter-modifier notation
(e.g., /foo|ba
Hi Jakob,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
>>> connected via the same physical network. Even in the very unlike case
>>> that there is a transient problem at the time of the connection
>>> attempt to the first address, which does not exist at the time of
>>> second attempt, the deliver
Chris Wilson, 2010-06-16 14:24:
>> connected via the same physical network. Even in the very unlike case
>> that there is a transient problem at the time of the connection attempt
>> to the first address, which does not exist at the time of second
>> attempt, the delivery will be retried again, mu
Hi Jakob,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
>>> relays was blocked on my mailserver because it connected to the second
>>> MX without trying the first one before...
>>
>> For the reasons that Heiko and Graeme gave, I would strongly recommend
>> against blocking anyone on this basis. (i.e. t
Chris Wilson, 2010-06-16 13:48:
>> relays was blocked on my mailserver because it connected to the second
>> MX without trying the first one before...
> For the reasons that Heiko and Graeme gave, I would strongly recommend
> against blocking anyone on this basis. (i.e. there could have been a
>
W B Hacker, 2010-06-16 13:24:
(sorry for repost)
> There is no MX RR for relay.rzone.de Exim appears to have found it by its A
> RR.
You seem to think relay.rzone.de is the rcpt domain of the message the
OP had a message for. But it's only a hostname listed as a MX for some
domain.
> Either
Hi Jakob,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> Funny thing is, just two days ago a message from Strato's outbound
> relays was blocked on my mailserver because it connected to the second
> MX without trying the first one before...
For the reasons that Heiko and Graeme gave, I would strongl
W B Hacker wrote:
> Jakob Hirsch wrote:
>> Dr. Tilo Levante, 2010-06-15 15:58:
>>
>>> we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
>>>
>>> 450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary MX
>>> is available - please send your mail to ...
>>>
>>> Does exim use the Backu
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> Dr. Tilo Levante, 2010-06-15 15:58:
>
>> we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
>>
>> 450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary MX
>> is available - please send your mail to ...
>>
>> Does exim use the Backup MX if the primary MX is a
Heiko Schlittermann, 2010-06-16 11:36:
> But it's quite stupid by second mx, to think that my (network)
> connectivity to the second mx is the same as to the first mx.
This highly depends on the setup.
I have only a single (private) mail server which has two IP addresses,
so the connectivity, ava
Dr. Tilo Levante, 2010-06-15 15:58:
> we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
>
> 450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary MX
> is available - please send your mail to ...
>
> Does exim use the Backup MX if the primary MX is available? Can I
> configure
Interesting discussion, this.
For a given well-designed MX platform where the MX servers are
physically separated and are on different networks with different
upstream providers, there are myriad reasons why any two MX servers for
a given domain might not be able to reach each other. That means th
Hi Heiko,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>>> Does exim use the Backup MX if the primary MX is available? Can I
>>> configure exim to prefer the primary MX?
>>
>> Exim should try the primary first, as any MTA should. Sometimes it may
>> fail to reach the primary, and fall back t
Chris Wilson (Mi 16 Jun 2010 09:53:41 CEST):
> Hi Tilo,
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
>
> > we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
> >
> > 450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary MX
> > is available - please send your mail to ...
> >
Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
>
> 450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary MX
> is available - please send your mail to ...
>
> Does exim use the Backup MX if the primary MX is available? Can I
> configure ex
Hi Tilo,
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
> we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
>
> 450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary MX
> is available - please send your mail to ...
>
> Does exim use the Backup MX if the primary MX is available? C
Hi,
we have the following log entry about the backup MX:
450 4.1.0 Don't use the Backup MX 'relay.rzone.de' while the Primary
MX is available - please send your mail to ...
Does exim use the Backup MX if the primary MX is available? Can I
configure exim to prefer the primary MX?
Thanks fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
