, Mabuse wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I would like to place a feature request regarding signatures in
> evolution:
>
> I find those preceeding "--" before signatures in e-mails very
> disturbing.
bg:
Then you are not thinking it completely through. Surely it
I just took the risky step of accepting Ubuntu's relentless hectoring to
upgrade my
14.04 to 16.04. Everything came out fine (except for the forced shift to Unity)
except for Evolution (3.18.5.2). It is unable to see the (wired ethernet)
network connection.
How I know this is an Evo problem:
1.
On Saturday I posted a query about my new 3.18.5.2 claim that it has no network
connection. I have verification that this is an Evo problem, because my browser
is connecting to the Net just fine, as are my iPad and iPhone, which both,
by the way, are using the same mail server, with all the same se
Ubuntu 16.04 with Evo 3.18.5.2
Evo has apparently changed what's being used as the internal editor for
composing - and
not for the better. I want to change to gedit or almost anything else
than what's on offer.
But when I consult the "HELP" files, it directs me to
,
and when I click that sequen
Ubuntu 16.04 Evo 3.18.5.2
This only showed up in the latest version - never a problem previously.
When I copy an email address into the buffer, it refuses to paste in
any of the address fields.
I find it difficult to believe that anyone could have conceived this as
an enhancement,
so would have
bg:
> > When I copy an email address into the buffer, it refuses to paste
> in
> > any of the address fields.
>
Andre:
> What is "the buffer" and how do you "copy" and how do you "paste"?
>
bg:
The buffer is a basic system function used b
m any IMAP client, including on your phone.
>
> poc
> _______
>
bg:
Okay, Patrick, that raises a question. I stick to POP and always have,
and my bride and I each have both iPhones and iPads which we regularly
use to fetch our mail traffic w
bg:
> > So what compelling reason would there be for us to change to IMAP?
> > We danged sure don't do any "sharing" with anyone else,and being
> > retired, foresee no chance that we ever would. So - IMAP - ??? Why?
> >
Pete Biggs wrote:
> The issue
3.18.5.2 on Ubunto 16.04
Is it possible that Evo imposes a limitation on the number of addresses
that the BCC field
is allowed to contain? I have had a couple of recent cases where a list
was truncated from
its original count ??? I find no mention of such a limit in the "HELP"
files, but I can im
C. Andrews Lavarre wrote:
> As to the digest:
>
> • As a newbie here I would much prefer a normal Internet group (e.g.,
> Google Groups) over
> email of any sort, but if email it must be then the digest is better
> than a constant flurry of incomings.
bg:
I am both amused an
dnight
> (00:00 UTC) on Monday August 6th.
>
>
bg:
Thanks, guys, for your tireless efforts. So glad to see the (&$^%& Digest
suffer its well-deserved demise. No longer will we have to suffer those
woefully unhelpful subject lines, or the 480-line responses where six lines
would h
it's pretty simple to
> reproduce) would be nice.
>
bg:
Why format emails in HTML in the first place? A great many people view
HTML-coded emails, and not unreasonably IMO, as poor security, since
AFAIK they can contain little ride-along malware poison pills buried
in their code. I k
I presently run Fedora Core2 and Evo 1.4.6. Yeah, I know :-)
I am about to sketch out a strategy for upgrading to (32-bit)
Ubuntu 8.10, which includes Evo 2.24.3, although what with
the rather aggressive nature of the synaptic package manager,
I will doubtless be involuntarily upgraded to a slig
bg:
> > In playing with the trial installation
> > on another box, I've verified that Evo doesn't recognize
> > importing of those elements from previous Evo versions.
Pete Biggs wrote:
> Not exactly true. When upgrading, Evo will upgrade data from previous
>
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 03:19, Art Alexion wrote:
> Why would you install 8.10? The current version is 9.04, and the long term
> support release is 8.04.
bg:
According to what I thought I saw when I first visited the Ubuntu site a
few weeks ago, 8.10 was listed as the latest LTS release
Art Alexion wrote:
> Lastly, when you say "upgrade", are you seriously considering trying to
> install
> a relatively new Debian based distro on top of a very old rpm based distro?
bg:
Not at all - I used the word in the generic, not the technical sense.
I figure to instal
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 06:09, Pete Biggs wrote:
> As someone else said, the best way would be to upload all your mail to
> an IMAP server and then re-download it to your new installation - you
> could possibly set up your own IMAP server locally to do it.
bg:
That's doable - I
> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:13 -0700, Matt Teiken wrote:
> > > I have installed Evolution in our small office, but users are coming
> > > to me on a regular basis complaining about the same thing:
> > >
> > > They are storing signatures as HTML, they work fine, UNTIL they close
> > > and re-open
steele:
> > Given that I'm using windows, storing valuable data on the same drive as
> > windows is inherently dangerous.
tor:
> Do you have any reiable source or is this just a random hearsay?
bg:
The "reliable source" is the unfortunate experience of many Win
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:15, Dave Jewett wrote:
> I apologize for the top post. Most of the world top posts;
bg:
Which simply demonstrates that the world is mostly made up
of the clueless and care-less.
dave:
> and I could not immediate find the section of my email client
> to recon
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 08:12, Ben May wrote:
> I have to say - this thread has given me more laughs than any I've
> gotten from a mailing list since I used to be on the EDM one back in the
> late 90s. Bravo!
bg:
Likewise. I can't believe there are so many people who think you
h
that response
> is the day I go back to a yellow pad and pencil.
>
> Yikes!
>
> Chuck...
bg:
I guess that means you fall into the "care-less" category.
Up yours.
There are multiple levels of ease of readability in emails,
especially on discussion lists. *You* may be s
netiquette (or the convenience of subsequent readers).
bg:
How very right you are. It's pleasant to read that there are others
who fully understand.
williams:
> Thus you are
> wasting bandwidth and every other readers time. Hashing these things
> with people WHO DO NOT CARE is pointle
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48, David L wrote:
> This only happens with
> certain emails... these emails get a little dotted box around
> the text of the original message whenever I click anywhere
> in the message. Any ideas?
bg:
I wish I knew an answer to that, but I doubt there is
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:48, David L wrote:
> > > This only happens with
> > > certain emails... these emails get a little dotted box around
> > > the text of the original message whenever I click anywhere
> > > in the message. Any ideas?
> >
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 18:09 -0700, bg wrote:
> > Maybe my version of Evo is
> > too ancient (a distinct possibility)
Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Wow .. you're using "Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2)" !!
> I didn't known it was possible to still use such
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:22, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:03:18AM -0700, bg wrote:
> >
> > Older than dirt - Core2.
> >
> > It's pretty stable, though. The only real problem that's beginning
> > to get annoying is the Mozilla 1.7
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:46, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:10 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Its much easier to top post to non-mailing l
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I took the view that Evo encourages top-posting because it places
> the cursor at the top of the reply.
bg:
Only for the irremediably clueless and rude, or those who haven't
had the reason pointed out to them.
PO:
29 matches
Mail list logo
