[Evolution] Problems with evo: Error writing data to TLS socket: The specified session has been invalidated for some reason.

Hi, Suddenly evo refuses to read mail from my email account: Failed to open folder. The reported error was “Error reading data from TLS socket: The specified session has been invalidated for some reason.”. And: Failed to finish trust prompt for “a...@gmail.com” No PEM-encoded certificate found.

[Evolution] Cannot connect to gmail account any longer

Hi, With the latest debian packages, 3.16.3-1.1 evo cannot any longer connect to Contacts and the gmail account: Failed to connect to 'Contacts' Cannot find a corresponding account in the org.gnome.OnlineAccounts service from which to obtain a password for 'a...@gmail.com' Failed to connect acco

Re: [Evolution] Cannot connect to gmail account any longer

On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 11:21 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 10:54 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Failed to connect to 'Contacts' > > Cannot find a corresponding account in the org.gnome.OnlineAccounts > > service from which to obtain a password for

Re: [Evolution] Cannot connect to gmail account any longer

On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 13:05 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 12:01 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > I don't have gnome-control-center installed at all. And it cannot > > be > > installed since it depends on gnome-settings-daemon which depends

Re: [Evolution] Bug#795287: evolution-data-server: Cannot connect to gmail account any longer

reopen 795287 thanks On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 17:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 10/09/15 16:33, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:55 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Removing that account in preferences and setting it up again does > > > not f

[Evolution] Why do all new mails end up in junk folders?

Hi, Suddenly all my incoming mails end up in junk folders. This happened to at least two mail accounts. Any ideas? dpkg -l evolution ii  evolution  3.18.1-1 amd64 ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list optio

Re: [Evolution] Why do all new mails end up in junk folders?

On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 18:53 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Hola, > > On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 15:47 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Suddenly all my incoming mails end up in junk folders. This > > happened > > to at least two mail accounts. Any ideas? > > POP a

[Evolution] Why are all new mails ending up in the junk folder?

Hi, After upgrade of my evolution version suddenly all new mails arrive in the junk folder. Even if no junk filtering has been selected. Email account is from gmail. Hoping for help, thanks. Installed version Debian: evolution 3.22.4-1 ___ evolution-l

Re: [Evolution] Why are all new mails ending up in the junk folder?

On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:34 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:28 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > After upgrade of my evolution version suddenly all new mails arrive in the > > junk > > folder. Even if no junk filtering has been selected. Email acco

Re: [Evolution] Why are all new mails ending up in the junk folder?

On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 10:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > After upgrade of my evolution version suddenly all new mails arrive in the > > junk > > folder. Even if no junk filtering has been selected. Email account is from > > gmail. > > > > When you say "no junk filtering" what do you mean? Is it t

Re: [Evolution] Why are all new mails ending up in the junk folder?

On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 11:58 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > When you say "no junk filtering" what do you mean? Is it turned off in > > > Preferences -> Mail Preferences -> Junk? > > > > Turned off, yes. > > Hmm, if everything in the Junk preferences is unticked, I don't know > how the messages can

Re: [Evolution] open

On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:19 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > And THIS IS NOT THE PLACE TO RANT ABOUT SYSTEMD. > > > > Nobody did, right? So why do you shout?  > > Because when ever anyone on any Linux related mailing list mentions > systemd it invariable descends into rants about it. I was att

[Evolution] Contacts got lost when changing username!

with this issue. Best regards, Svante Signell ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Contacts got lost when changing username!

with this issue. Best regards, Svante Signell ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Expunging

I assume this question has been asked before, maybe it is even in some FAQ. I am short of disk space and ~/.evolution is the main cause of this. Trying to reduce the size of folders I delete a lot of mails, but the largest folders cannot be expunged due to the lack of disk space. Is there an option

Re: [Evolution] Expunging

On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 15:19 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 20:58 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > I assume this question has been asked before, maybe it is even in some > > FAQ. I am short of disk space and ~/.evolution is the main cause of > >

Re: [Evolution] Displaying .docx attachments?

wordprocessingml.document BTW: I've seen somewhere (and tried earlier) that I can open a Nautilus window of a file displayed in a e.g. Genome terminal window. Unfortunately I've forgotten it. It seems to be very handy sometimes as I don't use Nau

Re: [Evolution] Error refreshing folder

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:53 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:19 +0200, Svante R Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 17:44 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 17:17 +0200, Svante R Signell wrote: > > > > The problem is not at the server end.

[Evolution] [Fwd: Re: Preview pane not updated after expunging]

Seems like I cannot post from my telia address, using the kth one. Forwarded Message From: Svante Signell To: evolution-list Subject: Re: Preview pane not updated after expunging Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:40:25 +0200 On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 11:21 +0200, Svante Signell wrote

[Evolution] Preview pane not updated after expunging

As the title says, efter expunging a folder, where deleted mails are marked as deleted, the preview pane is not updated. The removed mails are still visible but of course not accessible, since they are already removed. Visiting another folder and back the mails marked for removal have disappeared.

Re: [Evolution] Preview pane not updated after expunging

On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 11:21 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > As the title says, efter expunging a folder, where deleted mails are > marked as deleted, the preview pane is not updated. The removed mails > are still visible but of course not accessible, since they are already > remov

[Evolution] [Fwd: How to recover?]

Sorry, should have sen form the current mail account. The telia one is corrupt! Forwarded Message From: Svante Signell To: evolution-list Bcc: svante.sign...@telia.com Subject: How to recover? Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:44:11 +0200 Seems like my local spool directory has

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: How to recover?]

Sorry the mail file was .evolution/mail/spool/var/mail/'user'/INBOX. Seems like the INBOX file is gone only INBOX.* files remains)?? However, the /var/mail/'user' file is still there! Help please! On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:46 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Sorry, should ha

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: How to recover?]

user'/INBOX. Only the INBOX.* files and folders.db was present! On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:56 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Sorry the mail file was .evolution/mail/spool/var/mail/'user'/INBOX. > Seems like the INBOX file is gone only INBOX.* files remains)?? However, > the /va

Re: [Evolution] unsubscribe

Read at the end of your message!! On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:09 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 19:00 +0100, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote: > > unsubscribe > > > > me +6 > > _

Re: [Evolution] unsubscribe

On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:54 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 15:19 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Read at the end of your message!! > > Read the link Adam gave > > (and the link within it ) Yes, I see now! I thought it was a request to unsub

Re: [Evolution] Big problems with evo

On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:44 +, Svante R Signell wrote: > From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org [evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org] on > behalf of Svante R Signell [s...@kth.se] > Sent: 21 March 2011 15:57 > To: awill...@whitemice.org; evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Big pro

[Evolution] Solved: RE: Big problems with evo

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:55 +0100, Svante R Signell wrote: > From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org [evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org] on > behalf of Svante R Signell [s...@kth.se] > Sent: 22 March 2011 15:07 > To: Pete Biggs; evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Big problems with e

[Evolution] Mail filter question

Hi, Is it possible to have mail filtering based on the account used. I have two email accounts one one computer with a message filter for incoming messages, automatically moving messages to a specific local folder when the recipients are a certain mailing list. However, one of the accounts is an I

Re: [Evolution] Mail filter question

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 09:44 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > Is it possible to have mail filtering based on the account used. > > Add a filter condition of "Source Account" and specify that all > conditions must be met. Thanks, I did search in the conditions but did not find it then. Problem s

Re: [Evolution] Mail filter question

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:53 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 09:44 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > Is it possible to have mail filtering based on the account used. > > > > Add a filter condition of "Source Account" and

[Evolution] NOT SOLVED: Re: Solved: RE: Big problems with evo

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 19:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:55 +0100, Svante R Signell wrote: > > From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org [evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org] > > on behalf of Svante R Signell [s...@kth.se] > > Sent: 22 March 2011 15:

Re: [Evolution] Mail filter question

On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 06:44 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 12:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:53 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 09:44 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > ... >

Re: [Evolution] NOT SOLVED: Re: Solved: RE: Big problems with evo

On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:25 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > This comes up when all folder data has been downloaded: > > (evolution:15297): camel-imap-provider-WARNING **: No information for > > message 1 > > > > Then download starts again. > > > > Just out of interest, are you asked for a password

Re: [Evolution] Mail filter question

On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 07:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 07:14 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > What happens if "a or b, delete" is issued before the other two? Is > > some > > > priority order available? > > > > Yes, but mail filter rules [AFAIK] are always pro

Re: [Evolution] FW: NOT SOLVED: IMAP problems persists

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:12 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:53 +, Svante R Signell wrote: > > From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org [evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org] > > on behalf of Pete Biggs [p...@biggs.org.uk] > > Sent: 19 April 2011 16:27 > > To: evolution-list@gnome

Re: [Evolution] FW: NOT SOLVED: IMAP problems persists

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:36 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:04 +, Svante R Signell wrote: > > Sorry, I'm using M$ webmail I have not found out how to make changes to > > these settings! I'm trying to edit the comment style and quoting by hand! > > Now top posting,

Re: [Evolution] FW: NOT SOLVED: IMAP problems persists

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:57 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:36 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:04 +, Svante R Signell wrote: > > > > Sorry, I

[Evolution] Stability of evo?

Hi, After having a lot of problems with earlier 2.x versions of evo (some still not yet solved), at least it was semi-stable. Now we are faced with 3.0. And of course it crashes, see e.g. Debian bug report #638936. In the past filing a bug report to bugzilla was not much helpful, but maybe that c

Re: [Evolution] Stability of evo?

On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > After having a lot of problems with earlier 2.x versions of evo (some > > still not yet solved), at least it was semi-stable. > > > >

Re: [Evolution] Stability of evo?

On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:42 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2011, 11:31 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 07:12 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > Why don't you try 3.1.5 which just became available? > > > > PLEASE ALWAYS mention that 3.1.5 is

Re: [Evolution] [RFC - general discussion] GNOME standard email program should have "Remove Duplicates" feature by default...

On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 13:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 22:12 -0700, warfie wrote: > > Any idea why Evolution continually downloads the same emails a dozen or more > > times per day? > > Any idea how to stop it? Or at least, automate the removal of duplicates? > > Hi, >

[Evolution] 3.0.3 is out: Re: Bug#638936: Stability of evo?

On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:10 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2011-08-24 at 16:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: &g

Re: [Evolution] evolution hangs

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 12:20 +0100, Joao Ferreira Gmail wrote: > Hello, > > Ever since I upgraded (Debian box) to Evolution 3.0.2-1 I have been > experiencing both hangs and crashes. > > Can I do something about it ? Yes, upgrade to evo 3.0.3. I don't know why this version ever went into testing,

[Evolution] evo 3.0.3 and pop3 problems

Hi, evo 3.0.3 does not crash any longer, compared to 3.0.2, thanks for that. However, some of the pop3 problems remains: 1) Fetching mail works OK, when starting evo. 2) Fetching mail when evo runs, takes forever (no timeout?) 3) Cancelling the mail fetch (red button) does not have any effect (n

Re: [Evolution] evo 3.0.3 and pop3 problems

Milan. Thanks for your prompt reply. On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 07:32 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: ... > After the first message fetching, when you look between opened > connections of evolution, does it list the one to your PO

Re: [Evolution] Evolution stuck on a message

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 14:25 -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Hello all, > > In the INBOX for my primary IMAP account, Evolution has become stuck on > the last message I viewed before quitting. Other accounts, as well as > other folders in the same account work as expected. > > I can select differ

Re: [Evolution] evo 3.0.3 and pop3 problems

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 09:24 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:55 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > I cannot reproduce this now, looks like the pop3 server responds > > correctly now? > > > > > And what if you get a backtrace of running >

Re: [Evolution] evo 3.0.3 and pop3 problems

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 09:24 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:55 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > I cannot reproduce this now, looks like the pop3 server responds > > correctly now? > > > > > And what if you get a backtrace of running >

Re: [Evolution] evo 3.0.3 and pop3 problems

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 08:07 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 21:02 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Attached is a BT. HTH! > > Hi, > thanks for the update. I see in the backtrace that it's trying to > connect to the server, waiting for a response f

[Evolution] Still pop3 problems with evo 3.0.3

Hi, with the release of 3.0.3 evo does not crash anymore, thanks for that. However, there are still problems with POP3 servers. Often fetching mail hangs and cancelling only continue the hang. Additionally, when deleting mails with jpeg attachments, the download still continues and hangs, cancelli

Re: [Evolution] Still pop3 problems with evo 3.0.3

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:19 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: ... > > Now I have to force a quit of evo since expunging and fetching email are > > hung indefinitely. > > Hi, > could you open a bug report for this at [1], please? It'll be easier to > investigate there, with backtraces of running evolu

Re: [Evolution] Still pop3 problems with evo 3.0.3

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:19 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > with the release of 3.0.3 evo does not crash anymore, thanks for that. > > However, there are still problems with POP3 servers. Often fetching mail > > hang

[Evolution] Problems with message filtering and automatic expunging

Hi, When adding a filter rule to move a message from the INBOX to a folder, that mail disappears from the INBOX folder immediately. This happens even if the Show Deleted Messages in the View menu has been selected. Deleting messages from the INBOX manually works OK, they don't disappear until I ex

Re: [Evolution] Problems with message filtering and automatic expunging

On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 09:22 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 13:12 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > When adding a filter rule to move a message from the INBOX to a folder, > > that mail disappears from the INBOX folder immediately. This happens > > eve

Re: [Evolution] Problems with message filtering and automatic expunging

On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 11:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 25 November 2011 09:52, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > I don't think MOVE is the same as DELETE (although they might > be the same in IMAP protocol terms) - most clients for a MOVE > will do a COPY + EXPUNGE

[Evolution] Message preview locked on a specific message

Hi, I see this problem every now and then: The message preview is locked to a specific message, even when clicking on another message. Unchecking message preview and checking it again solves the problem. Debian evo 3.0.3-2, IMAP folder. A known issue? ___

Re: [Evolution] URGENT: Need help to restore evolution

On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 08:57 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > Hi, > Evolution shows the setup wizard only when it doesn't have any mail > account configured. As is written in the second sentence of the link to > FAQ you replied to: >"your account settings in $HOME/.gconf/apps/evolution" > You ma

[Evolution] Defaults for opening attached pdf-files and attaching files?

Hi, I'm running Debian testing/Wheezy with evolution 3.4.3-1 and have experienced two annoying things with evo lately: 1) When opening an attached pdf file, inkscape comes up as the first alternative foe Open With. What is controlling this strange behaviour? The complete list is in order: Save As

Re: [Evolution] Defaults for opening attached pdf-files and attaching files?

On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 16:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > I'm running Debian testing/Wheezy with evolution 3.4.3-1 and have > > experienced two annoying things with evo lately: > > > > 1) When opening an attached pdf file, inkscape comes up as the first > > alternative foe Open With. What is c

[Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

Hi, Forwarding this problem to the list. Maybe somebody has a solution/explanation? Is it fixed for 3.6.x? If so, is a simple backport possible? Thanks! Forwarded Message From: Svante Signell Reply-to: svante.sign...@telia.com To: 640...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: local mail

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 15:30 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > severity 640851 serious > > > found 640851 3.4.3-1 > > > found 640851 3.4.4-1 > > > thanks > > > > > > I was waiti

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 10:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for the latest bugfix release to see if the local > > > > > mailbox > > > > > spool problem was solved. Unfortunately it was not :( Local mails are > > > > > delivered to /var/mail/ and these are the settings u

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 10:39 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > > > They are the normal indexing and config files for mail accounts - they > > > > > don't contain any emails. > > > > > > > > It seem like evo is looking for the mails in that directory?? > > > > > > I can't see anywhere where

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

To enter the list, I need to send from the right mail account. On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 12:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > And the "strange name" is actually the UID of the account within Evo, > which you will be able to see at the beginning of the line from gconf. > OK! > > > Have you actually lo

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 22:44 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > I see the following with strace: > > > > This indicates a bug in someone's code. You must ensure an error is NULL > > before it's set. > > The overwriting error message was: Could not lock '/var/mail/' > > And that is the root of all

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 09:37 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > This indicates a bug in someone's code. You must ensure an error is > > > > NULL before it's set. > > > > The overwriting error message was: Could not lock '/var/mail/' > > > > > > And that is the root of all your problems. > > >

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 12:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > And the "strange name" is actually the UID of the account within Evo, > which you will be able to see at the beginning of the line from gconf. > OK! > > > Have you actually looked to see if the actual spool file is accessed at > > > all?

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 13:45 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > OK. I've done some more Googling on your behalf - there was a > Debian/Ubuntu packaging bug that might affect you - basically make sure > that /usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2 is SGID mail. Thanks for your help so far. Still not the

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 16:14 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 13:45 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > OK. I've done some more Googling on your behalf - there was a > > Debian/Ubuntu packaging bug that might affect you - basically make sure > > that

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 19:07 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 16:14 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 13:45 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > OK. I've done some more Googling on your behalf - there was a > > > Debian/

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 22:38 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 23:19 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 19:07 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 16:14 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 00:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > Have you run Evolution with debugging enabled on this newly installed > > > computer? Does it show any errors or problems? > > > > Not yet, will try that. The only debug flag from the man page says: --debug=FILE

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]

ping! On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 13:47 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 00:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > Have you run Evolution with debugging enabled on this newly installed > > > > computer? Does it show any errors or problems?

Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.6.3 Cannot Change Password

On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 14:22 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 17:04 +, Svante R Signell wrote: > > (Sorry for top posting, I using the webmail (M$) interface.) > > Well, you could scroll to the bottom before typing ... Now sending from evo... > > I have a similar prob

Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.6.3 Cannot Change Password

On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 21:41 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 14:22 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 17:04 +, Svante R Signell wrote: ... > The passwords for the account I was sending from was not found in > seahorse on that co

Re: [Evolution] Problems displaing my mails: imapx.

On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 10:36 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 10:05 +, Svante R Signell wrote: > > Hello, > > > > my mails in INBOX are not displayed due to the following: > > No message satifies your search criteria. ... > > > > A subbox on the same account is displayed corre

[Evolution] How to run evolution without gnome-session?

Hi, Due to the annoying increased dependencies on systemd I would like to run evolution without having to install gnome-session, which drags in a lot of packages I don't want, especially the libsystemd-* stuff. Neither do I want network manager for internet connection. Is that possible at all, or

Re: [Evolution] How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 14:48 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 13:27 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Due to the annoying increased dependencies on systemd I would like to > > run evolution without having to install gnome-session, which drags in a > > lot of

Re: [Evolution] How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 14:30 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > For me evo starts, but does not connect to internet at all, the link is > > up and other applications works, e.g. iceweasel and apt?? > > So you need to start Evo with some debugging variables set so you can > see more of what's happeni

Re: [Evolution] How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 16:01 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 15:23 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > I have both gvfs and pulseaudio installed, but I don't think removing > > them will change anything? > > That are my preferences, I only mention

Re: [Evolution] How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 15:48 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > The only message of interest is? > > ** (evolution:13636): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: > > Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-KviD8yWNAI: Connection refused > > Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-

Re: [Evolution] Semi-OT: How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 12:48 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 16:21 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Regarding to your wish to stay away from systemd: > > > > I wasted much time with bad emotions when fighting against systemd, when > > Arch Linux made the transition. Many oth

Re: [Evolution] Semi-OT: How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 20:50 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 20:09 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > I really hope there are sufficiently many people opposing systemd > I wasted my power and I understand that you are willing to "fight", but > the &quo

Re: [Evolution] Semi-OT: How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 20:16 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > Yes, I can by supporting something that can be better in due time, and > > that's OpenRC, why don't you update yourself on that piece of software. > > (it does not use cgroups, that's one advantage for example) > > According to the vari

Re: [Evolution] How to run evolution without gnome-session?

On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 23:38 +0100, Ángel wrote: > Do you have gnome-keyring installed? Angel, you do really deserve your name. gnome-keyring was the culprit :) > Svante, evolution requires a org.freedesktop.secrets provider. Usually > gnome-keyring-daemon or kwallet (other programs also providing

[Evolution] Failed to refresh folder INBOX

Hi, Recently evolution shows the following message when accessing my IMAP account or expunging the folder: Failed to refresh folder "INBOX". The reported error was "Error syncing changes: Command Argument Error. 11 What to do? The problem is stuck on this particular box, and is not present on oth

Re: [Evolution] Failed to refresh folder INBOX

Hi again, It looks like I'm loosing a lot of mails on another email account (gmail). I can see them om my smartphone (and other boxes). Help! What to do? On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 08:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Hi, > > Recently evolution shows the following message when acc

Re: [Evolution] Failed to refresh folder INBOX

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 10:53 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > Recently evolution shows the following message when accessing my IMAP > > account or expunging the folder: > > Failed to refresh folder "INBOX". > > The reported error was "Error syncing changes: Command Argument Error. > > 11 > > > >

Re: [Evolution] Failed to refresh folder INBOX

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 10:53 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > Recently evolution shows the following message when accessing my IMAP > > > account or expunging the folder: > > > Failed to refresh f

Re: [Evolution] Failed to refresh folder INBOX

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:43 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > [imapx:D] I/O: 'D00037 UID STORE 10496159 +FLAGS.SILENT (JUNK)' > > [imapx:D] I/O: 'D00037 BAD Command Argument Error. 11' > >

Re: [Evolution] Failed to refresh folder INBOX/lost emails

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 16:02 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:43 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > [imapx:D] I/O: 'D00037 UID STORE 10496159 +FLAGS.SILENT (JUNK)' > > > [imapx:D] I/

[Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

Now I'm getting problems with some emails on one of my imapx accounts: Unable to retrieve message. Error fetching message: unexpected server response: What's going on?? This is on another computer than the one I reported from earlier. Installed: 3.12.2.1 ii evolution ii evolution-common ii ev

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 09:22 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 09:57 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Now I'm getting problems with some emails on one of my imapx accounts: > > > > Unable to retrieve message. > > Error fetching message: unexpected

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

ping On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 10:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 09:22 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 09:57 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Now I'm getting problems with some emails on one of my imapx accounts: > > >

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 09:35 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 20:51 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > ping > > Ah, the old subtle hint that you want a reply because you think you are > being ignored - and I thought the correct form these days was "

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 10:03 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > The problem looks like you are getting a null response when requesting > > > the body of a message. Try removing the local mail folder summary as > > > before. If that doesn't work, then you need to look at the server logs > > > to s

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 16:34 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > Removed folders.db and recerated it from .cache/evolution/mail/.../ and > > recreated it: > > > > (evolution:5139): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_closure_unref: assertion > > 'closure->ref_count > 0' failed > . > . > > > > (evolution:5139): G

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 23:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 16:34 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > Removed folders.db and recerated it from .cache/evolution/mail/.../ and > > > recreated it: > > > > > > (evolution:5139): GLib-GObject-

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve message.

On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 12:23 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 11:13 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Another unreadable message (there are plenty of them): > > tail -50l logfile: > > > > +#endif /* ! GRUB_TYPES_CPU_HEADER */ > > diff --git a/

  1   2   >