I've been using Evolution v1.4.6 on a RedHat 9 box for years and finally
decided it was time to move to something newer. I've installed Fedora 8,
which includes Evolution v2.12.1. I copied over my /evolution directory
hoping Evolution would notice it on start up and magically upgrade it.
No such lu
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 16:46 -0600, R. Steven Rainwater wrote:
> I've been using Evolution v1.4.6 on a RedHat 9 box for years and finally
> decided it was time to move to something newer. I've installed Fedora 8,
> which includes Evolution v2.12.1. I copied over my /evolution
Hi Barry,
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 18:28 -0600, Barry wrote:
> Digging deep here, I noted some November '07 info from Steven Rainwater
> and Patrick O'Callaghan in November, upgrading from 1.4.6 to 2.12.1,
> all in Redhat format;
Yes, finally got it done. Sadly, there's no built-in way of upgrading
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 10:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 19:17 +1100, Jesus Jr M Salvo wrote:
> > I have installed ( instead of upgraded ) F10 over an existing F9
> > installation. Have to mention Fedora release here as I can't recall
> > the release numbers of Evolutio
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 16:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > I have installed ( instead of upgraded ) F10 over an existing F9
I just finished going through the same Evolution upgrade here; Fedora 9
to Fedora 10 and I use maildir for local storage. The thing to remember
is that these days
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 14:06 +1100, Jesus Jr M Salvo wrote:
> That's exactly what I have done. I pointed the directory to the
> ~/crypt/SharedMail ( which is the decrypted version of ~/.crypt-raw
> using EncFS ), which is essentially a "backup" from a USB pen drive.
> However, Evo does not "see" any
There has been an increasing number of problems with the Maildir support
in Evolution during late 2008 and early 2009. With the latest release in
Fedora 10, it's almost unusable.
To summarize the three most annoying bugs with maildir (yes, these and
others have been filed in bugzilla):
When you
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:23 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:35 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm still getting an occasional inconsistency between the
> > unread message count in the folder pane and the actual
> > number of unread messages in the message pane.
>
> I di
