On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 20:47 +0200, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote:
> > A preference that lets you select your preferred default "reply
> > publicly" operation would be nice as well (I think we have something
> > like that for forward). The values could be "Best effort" (default),
> > "All recipie
Hi all; I've updated my makefile for building Evolution from git:
http://mad-scientist.net/evolution.html
This version supports Lucid and Maverick. Note it is NOT completely
tested. I was able to successfully build the 2.32 version of Evolution
on Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick), building only these pa
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 14:28 -0800, Kip Warner wrote:
> Thanks Jo-Erlend. I tried that and to no avail. I've lost all of my
> data, though its in database files somewhere. This is absolutely
> horrible and I can't believe it didn't check at startup for data that
> needs to be migrated to a new locat
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:04 +0100, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
Let's all please remember that virtually no useful information can be
provided regarding mail component behavior unless you tell us WHAT
SERVER TYPE YOU USE.
POP? IMAP? Google? Exchange? Etc. All these things have different
behavior
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 12:31 -0800, Tory M Blue wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:04 +0100, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> >> Le lundi 20 décembre 2010 à 09:14 -0500, Darren Govoni a écrit :
> >> > 1) I now get frequent "error storing f
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:17 -0800, N B Day wrote:
> Evo 2.32.1 is the default in Ubuntu 11.04, which will have its second
> alpha release late this month. The OP could install this and have the
> latest.
I don't understand this behavior on the part of Ubuntu. I get, kind of,
that they wanted to
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > But I can't see any reason to continue this trend! Why did Ubuntu ship
> > Evolution 2.30 with 10.10 (Maverick), which used Gnome 2.32? And why do
> > they intend (if this message is correct) to ship 2.32 with 11.04
> > (Natty), which w
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > But I can't see any reason to continue this trend! Why did Ubuntu ship
> > Evolution 2.30 with 10.10 (Maverick), which used Gnome 2.32? And why do
> > they intend (if this message is correct) to ship 2.32 with 11.04
> > (Natty), which w
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 21:27 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:00 +1100, Nick Jenkins wrote:
> > > FWIW, it was meaningful enough to me. The word 'Ubuntu' means that
> > > he's using a version of Evolution that is *so* old that I cannot be
> > > persuaded to care about it.
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 13:57 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Out of interest, why would most of the people in this list not use
> > Ubuntu?
> >
> I can only answer for myself, but I find Ubuntu has the feel of a "toy"
> operating system - as if it was designed for the hobbyist end of the
> market. I a
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 12:35 +0530, Akhil Laddha wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 17:59 -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote:
> > * Attach a message to an outgoing message. Note, this is not the same as
> > forwarding a message. I may want to attach a different message to a
> > reply, for example.
It works for me
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 10:01 -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote:
> > It works for me, to just drag messages from the summary window and drop
> > them into the attachment bar of an email message.
>
> Thanks, I'll try that. As a CLI guy, I looked first for a menu
> selection and didn't see one for this. (exmh h
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
Mine is really out of date; I haven't tried it since Evo 2.32 or so.
I don't recommend it.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To chan
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 09:18 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> [Ubuntu's package management tools has some equivalent to the "rpm"
> command but they change it every other week (apt, dpkg, whatever...).
I understand people can get frustrated with newbies, many of whom come
to Gnome via Ubuntu, bu
Hi all. I'm using Evolution 3.6.0 in Mint Cinnamon 14. However, this
problem has happened in various other (older) versions of Evolution, on
various other platforms, as well.
I'm connecting to my IMAP server (hosted by my ISP) using IMAP+. My ISP
has a built-in spam filter which will put (most
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:14 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Try subscribing to the spam folder through Folder->Subscriptions.
Aha! I wonder why that folder came up as "unsubscribed" by default?
Anyway fixed now. Thanks.
___
evolution-list mailing list
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > What would be the diff:
> >
> > [guru@tiny ~]$ CAMEL_DEBUG=all env | fgrep CAM
> > CAMEL_DEBUG=all
> > [guru@tiny ~]$ env CAMEL_DEBUG=all | fgrep CAM
> > CAMEL_DEBUG=all
As Pete points out, your use of env is misleading you.
Compare these
Hi all. I've recently upgraded to Evolution 3.11.3 using the Evolution
PPA for Ubuntu (I'm running Linux Mint 16).
Overall I really like it, but it seems like there's some issue with
accessing gmail accounts (but not my ISP IMAP account). If I look at my
gmail account with my browser I'll see I
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 07:48 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I have been told that they rate-limit IMAP and SMTP connections [I
> have not authoritative citation for this]. But if it is true and you
> are polling too frequently that could explain notification brown-outs.
I don't think this is
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 15:57 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 18 February 2014 13:23, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Because here's the thing: I have a company email account hosted by
> > gmail. So it's a gmail account and I use the normal gmail IMAP
> > se
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:15 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:12 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Can someone point me to the docs on how to generate debug/logging output
> > from the IMAP client? ISTR this came up just recently but I can't
> > locate
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 12:02 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:18 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Thanks, that's great. Is there a way to find this page if you don't
> > know it already?
> >
> > For example I went to https://wiki.gnome.or
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 13:00 -0500, Rick Leir wrote:
> I am debugging an installation of version 2.28.3 (don't ask) and am
> getting almost no output from
> $ CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx:io evolution
>
> Was there a different debug setting for this vintage of Evolution?
I don't remember IMAPX even being a
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 09:49 +, e-mail shaky.start wrote:
> I find myself in a quasi-Catch-22 situation: I moved from Ubuntu 12.04
> to Mint 16 Xfce yesterday, having made sure my Evolution client was
> fully backed up under Ubuntu. Evolution under Mint 16 Xfce 32 bit
> doesn't work at all - it
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 08:14 -0700, N B Day wrote:
> It looks like this silliness may finally be at an end. I'm using
> pre-release Ubuntu 10.04 which ships Evolution 3.10.4. According to
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution#Get_the_Source_Code this is the
> latest released stable version (2014-
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 14:29 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 11:20 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 20:27 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > Is using IMAP+ advisable in 3.4.4? I have some large folders, and the
> > > amount of time spent redownloadi
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:16 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:05 -0400, Marc Hurst wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend an ISP in the United States that is Linux friendly?
> > My current ISP recently updated their servers; and now they do not
> > communicate with Evolution on
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 20:34 +0200, Nicol Hermann wrote:
> Hello Ralf,
>
> thanks for your mail.
> I checked the settings dialog but do not have such an option. Stange.
> Is it probably language depended? I am using a German language settings.
I have the same situation; I'm using Ubuntu GNOME 14.0
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 09:32 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> So Ubuntu is apparently disabling Bogofilter support in Evolution,
> even though they do ship Bogofilter. Worth a bug report.
Unfortunately, I discovered one was already filed last year but no love:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
I'm using Evolution 3.12.4 on Ubuntu GNOME 14.04.
I often see errors like this show up in Evolution (they appear in a
little space above the subject/preview windows):
Execution of filter 'Junk check' failed: Empty cache
file:
/home/psmith/.cache/evolution/mail/1398703990.5795.13@myhost/folders/I
%% "Oscar Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
og> Same here, I had unsubscribed a while ago and I just begun
og> receiving messages again.
I wonder if they somehow resurrected a bunch of users when they migrated
the mailing list to the new address at gnome.org?
I suggest the simplest and q
401 - 431 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
