I'm trying to build 3.18.3, which fails as follows:
...
make[3]: Entering directory `/lvhome/olly/evolution/evolution-3.18.3/e-util'
CC libevolution_util_la-e-action-combo-box.lo
...
CCLD libevolution-util.la
.libs/libevolution_util_la-e-html-editor-view.o: In function
`html_editor_v
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 19:32 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 08:49 +0000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> >
> > $ CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/libsecret-1
> > EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_CFLAGS="-
> > I
> > /usr/local/include/evolution-data-server"
>
ocal addressbook data and mails?
Thanks
--
Oliver Elphick
Lincolnshire, England
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 12:32 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 21:38 +0000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > 1. On starting evolution, I had various messages from different
> > elements saying "the name 1.479 was not provided by any service
> > files".
>
l pick it
> and will add configured sources to the evolution.
>
Linux Mint's gnome-control-center only has 3 items, which don't include
Online Accounts.
I think I have had enough of fighting the distribution, so I'm now
looking at Gentoo.
--
Oliver Elphick
Lincolnshire,
Archive search of evolution-list from
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/ for any keyword
("subject" "summary" "crashes" are what I have tried) always returns no
result, even when there are definitely mails with the searched word i
Our mail setup flags messages with the prefix [SPAM] if they are so
judged by spamassassin.
However the message list does not display that prefix, so that it is not
easy to identify flagged messages without opening the mail.
How can I stop it doing this?
Oliver Elphick
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:11 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 09:41 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Our mail setup flags messages with the prefix [SPAM] if they are so
> > judged by spamassassin.
> >
> > However the message list does not display
