Re: [Evolution] delete not reliable

2006-03-13 Thread Nigel Metheringham
ensure that all teh changes have been pushed to the imap server is to quit the program. Killing it does not achieve this - so logging out without stopping evo would have the same effect. If you aren't using imap then its probably a permissions problem. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [E

Re: [Evolution] delete not reliable

2006-03-14 Thread Nigel Metheringham
ow planning a move off evolution completely - having been using it since the earliest builds in the days when those building it worked for Helixcode. As soon as I get palm sync working correctly against Kontact I am jumping ship. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution] Cleaning up Evo's cache

2006-03-20 Thread Nigel Metheringham
g then when you are on low or laggy bandwidth to the server is likely to result in frustration). I do completely shut down evolution before lobotomising it (ie evolution --force-shutdown). Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message ar

[Evolution] Calendar alert pop-ups

2006-04-07 Thread Nigel Metheringham
edit the appointment etc, but its a nice neat reminder that doesn't steal focus etc, so I would like to just use that Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opin

Re: [Evolution] IMAP "Outbox" feature

2006-04-14 Thread Nigel Metheringham
2476.html Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Deleting mail with virii?

2006-04-20 Thread Nigel Metheringham
see them by deselecting "View->Hide Deleted Messages". To delete them expunge the mailbox:- * Select that mailbox * Folder->Expunge (or control-e) or do it wholesale and use "File->Empty Trash" which expunges all folders that evolution can see.

Re: [Evolution] No provider available for protocol 'file'

2006-05-09 Thread Nigel Metheringham
d in the gnome bugzilla (probably with a link from the RH one, although thats currently not much use). Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ Evo

Re: [Evolution] "Evolution can not start" dialog

2006-05-25 Thread Nigel Metheringham
ot access calendar items, contacts etc until I had logged out and logged back in after seeing this problem. I have a bug against mail-notification for this... Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in

Re: [Evolution] Another little nitpic -- signature in compose window ??

2006-06-21 Thread Nigel Metheringham
-> Edit -> Identity (tab) There is a signature pull down at the bottom Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ Evoluti

Re: [Evolution] evo 2.6 on rhel 4?

2006-06-22 Thread Nigel Metheringham
and the costs of an Enterprise system (which won't be supported due to the mass of packages you have replaced). Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___

Re: [Evolution] new version (going from 2.4 to 2.6)

2006-06-29 Thread Nigel Metheringham
initely less user-friendly. Look at View->Switcher Appearence (You probably have it set to none at present). Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ Ev

Re: [Evolution] Subjects changed in message list - how can I stop it?

2005-09-22 Thread Nigel Metheringham
g the mail. I would make a guess that your system is adding a second Subject: header to the message, and (from your point of view) evolution is displaying the wrong one. If this is the case then you need to remove, or rename, the original header within your MTA. Nigel. -- [ Nig

Re: [Evolution] Subjects changed in message list - how can I stop it?

2005-09-22 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 11:55 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:11 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 09:41 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > Our mail setup flags messages with the prefix [SPAM] if they are so > >

Re: [Evolution] how to display text not html

2005-09-29 Thread Nigel Metheringham
ded to 2.2.x by mistake (if i remember > correctly). It should be noted that if the plugin is active, the ability to receive meeting requests breaks. Someone needs to take that plugin and give it a little loving to make it just a bit more selective. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham

Re: [Evolution] getting the text-only plugin back in evo 2.4

2005-10-17 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 08:48 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > As many of you are probably aware, a plugin "sneaked" its way into the > 2.2.3 version of evolution - the "prefer plain" or "only show text > parts" or whatever its called. > > I've heard tell that it was never meant to be there, and its no

Re: [Evolution] not all mail show up in sub folder

2005-11-29 Thread Nigel Metheringham
iltering on a particular phrase which only matches 2 messages. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gn

Re: [Evolution] palm treo 600 sync

2005-12-01 Thread Nigel Metheringham
show_bug.cgi?id=161824 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=160278 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161799 * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274032 -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message

Re: [Evolution] Palms and Evolution

2006-01-09 Thread Nigel Metheringham
u. [and with the blizzard of mails you have been sending out today that might be a good thing] Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]

[Evolution] Differing ical interpretations

2006-01-17 Thread Nigel Metheringham
I'm generating a bunch of ical events from a db application which I want to make available to various applications including evolution, phpicalendar, ical and the mozilla calendar stuff. However each of these appears to implement a slightly different interpretation of the standard - especially whe