plans to include TNEF support? Or is it built-in and
> I've just missed it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Justin
>
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.or
nfo/workaround/open bug/whatever? I like Evo (I know, probably
> I'm masochist-kind) but this is (obviously) a blocker for email use, if
> not using html (that, correctly, it is not always welcome on the
> receiving side).
>
> Regards,
> gt
>
> ___
> Evolution-list m
ific folder etc?
Evolution does not upport ACLs
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
y for the user to
override. Just like there are POP servers out there that drop the user
if a command is issued that it doesn't understand, instead of simply
returning -ERR and continuing like it is supposed to do according to the
specs.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EM
ts like sylpheed and mutt would display *all* of my
> folders, while clients like Evolution and SquirrelMail would not.
>
> Jim
>
> _______
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evol
Some IMAP servers (Courier being one of them), nests all (personal)
folders under INBOX and doesn't let you create folders on the same level
as INBOX.
Hope that helps,
Jeff
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 13:04 -0700, Alex Laughlin wrote:
> I've got an imap server running courier and Evolution is having s
Hmmm, I thought we had written the move-folder/rename-folder code to
recursively move/rename but perhaps we did not or perhaps that code has
gotten broken somehow.
Please submit a bug at bugzilla.gnome.org so it can be looked at.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 10:14 +0100, Oli wrote:
> Hi,
>>far) Has anyone found a better workaround or way to fix it?
> >>
> >>Thanks very much in advance,
> >>-Oli
> >>
> >>___
> >>Evolution-list mailing list
> >>Evolution-list@gnome
Can you point me to an IETF RFC/Internet Draft of the specification?
Jeff
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 22:04 +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 avril 2006 à 08:50 -0500, Ron Johnson a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:45 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > I was wondering if any version of Evo
what is ~/.evolution2/ ? Evolution has never used any such path.
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 21:55 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I have just installed and run clamav. clamscan found 49 corrupted files
> in ~/.evolution and ~/.evolution2. Some of them from restored /home
> files from previous v
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 07:36 -0400, William Case wrote:
> Hi Ron;
>
> On Tue, 2006-18-04 at 23:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 21:55 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > I have just installed and run clamav. clamscan found 49 corrupted files
> > > in ~/.evolutio
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 23:47 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of my IMAP folders (spam, history subfolders for mailing lists,
> etc) don't really need to be cached, but are, even if I accidentally
> go into them.
>
> So, a suggestion: add a boolean "do not cache" folder property.
>
> Exa
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 23:22 +0100, Andrew Wheeler wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am having a problem with evolution 2.6.0.
> When I send an email I get the following message -
>
> Failed to append to file:///home/andrew/evolution/local/Sent: No
> provider available for protocol `file'
> Appending to l
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:22 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 11:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > what is ~/.evolution2/ ? Evolution has never used any such path.
>
> I'm pretty sure that it used ~/evolution2 in the 2.0 era.
nope, never. it went
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:31 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 13:52 +0100, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > [Replying to own post]
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:08 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:39 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Le samedi 22 avril 2006 à 22:31 +0200, Jerome Warnier a écrit :
> > Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 13:52 +0100, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> [..]
> > > For me, I would like a way of
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:04 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Le lundi 24 avril 2006 à 11:05 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:31 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 13:52 +0100, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> > > > On
did you install evolution-data-server?
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 17:08 +0800, Murray Trainer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am getting the error below trying to run evolution 2.6.0 on SuSE
> 10.0. Any ideas?
>
> Murray
>
>
> evolution: error while loading shared libraries:
> libcamel-provider-1.2.so.8: c
looks like you don't have a libcamelexchange.so plugin
Jeff
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 11:11 -0400, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
> With the release of the evolution 2.6.1-1 packages for Debian, I
> upgraded by Debian Testing release (the packages are still in Unstable;
> I explicitly installed the new versions)
You'll probably want to contact the maintainer of the FreeBSD packages.
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 23:54 -0400, Daniel Shakhmundes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.4 and recently upgraded all installed ports
> (portupgrade -a). Now I am missing icons/images in Evolution, which
> display a p
Unfortunately I don't know anything about Exchange
Jeff
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 12:24 +0530, Sushma Rai wrote:
> I have no clues why your server sends
> "507 Insufficient Space to Store Resource"
>
> Jeff, Partha, any clues?
>
> -Sushma.
>
> On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 18:00 +0200, Ignacio Mas Ivars w
no
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 13:28 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> is there any way to set up a filter to delete any mail where the sender
> is NOT in the address book?
>
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/
You should probably be using the "imap" account type rather than the
"imap4" account type. Try changing over to "imap" and selecting folders
for your vfolder and see if that works for ya.
Jeff
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 21:14 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> somewhere in the middle of using
Did you install all of the icon themes packages? Perhaps you missed one
or more (I have no idea what the themes packages are, I just know
there's at least 2 or 3).
All icons work no matter what theme I use for me...
Jeff
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 13:49 -0400, James White wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-29
if you can open them, then the server didn't actually expunge them
yet :)
it also means that the server didn't give Evolution any expunge
notification untagged responses, which would be WHY they haven't been
removed from Evolution's display, and hence would not be a bug.
Jeff
On Tue, 2006-05-30
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:59 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 10:19 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > if you can open them, then the server didn't actually expunge them
> > yet :)
> >
> > it also means that the server didn't give Evolution
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:00 +1200, Eustace, Glen wrote:
> > Evo deletes messages from the server when you expunge them. Otherwise
> > they're just marked for deletion so you can undelete them if you want.
> > This is how IMAP is supposed to work. IMAP is explicitly *not* meant
> to
> > keep multip
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:17 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> It's been said enough about delays and slowness in Evolution. Here is
> yet another very annoying one. Documentation says that "Evolution
> normally sends mail as soon as you click Send". Well, it's not really
> true. When I click Send, a
well, you are welcome to dig into the problem and send a patch if you
feel that strongly about it.
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 18:35 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:24 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> >
> > It queues a send operation on a thread, but
This is a problem with the filters, it means your filter rules are
suffering from a version mismatch with Evolution. To fix it, edit your
filters and re-select the folder for each Copy/Move filter.
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 09:06 +0100, Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the above occasionally wh
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:56 +0200, guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:38 -0500, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:26 +0200, guenther wrote:
> >
> > > > I am using
> > > > evolution-2.6.0-1
> > > > on
> > > > 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386
the only spam filter we ship is the SpamAssassin spam filter. any others
are added by the distro maintainers and so you'd have to ask them.
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 03:10 -0700, H.M. Gladney wrote:
> Please, what is the recommended spam filter for use with Evolution in
> a Fedora Core 5 environment
Evolution doesn't use seahorse or care anything about it
anyways, verifying pgp/gpg signatures works fine for me in Evo, so not
sure what the problem could be...
also, the key id is for signing, not verifying.
Jeff
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:46 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> gpg/pgp
X-Evolution-PostTo is internal to evolution, it is simply the inetral
URI for a folder path. It is not meant to necessarily be identical to
any real URLs.
That said, gmane is read-only - that's why it didn't send.
Jeff
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 22:12 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> 1) I
t;
>
>
>
> Laurence M Turan
>
>
>
>
>
> ______
>
> From: Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bernhard Kleine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Might help if you provide the message source, perhaps it is not using a
standard format that Evolution recognises?
That would seem to be what the error message is indicating...
File a bug on bugzilla.gnome.org and attach a sample S/MIME message that
exhibits this behaviour.
Jeff
On Mon, 2006-06
gnupg is what connects to the keyserver. edit ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf and
setup your auto-key-retrieve and keyserver, etc. options there.
Jeff
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 13:45 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 02.06.2006, 09:24 -0400 schrieb Jeffrey Stedfast:
> > Evolution do
read the link at the bottom of every message
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 09:07 -0700, Yves Bajard wrote:
> How can I un-subscribe? There is nothing in the info page to tell me how
> to do it..
>
> Thanks
>
> Yves Bajard
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
is
> an bug,
> because evolution-2.6-C.omf shouldn't next extension .out
>
> Please help
> THX
> Tomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
filter "pipe to" command":
>
> >"clamscan --quiet -"
>
> This returns a 0 or 1 result depending upon the scan result which can be
> used by Evolution in a conditional filter sequence.
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
>
> ___
-06-19 at 12:06 -0400, Thomas R. Krishan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 09:38 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > According to the code in camel-filter-driver.c:pipe_to_system(),
> > Evolution does in fact re-read the message from the piped program and
> > replaces the pre-fil
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 14:48 -0400, Thomas R. Krishan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 13:24 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> > I think only the Pipe-to-Program *action* (not rule) reads back data
> > from the piped program... That might explain what you are seeing?
>
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 15:54 -0400, Thomas R. Krishan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 14:59 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> > no, that is the Pipe-to-Program *rule*
> >
> > Filters are as such:
>
> FYI, when I first came across this problem, I also tested it th
ld I make a feature request in bugzilla ?
>
> Thanks,
> Xav
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-l
9,
>
>
>
> Is this a known bug? Does it have anything to do with whether my sound
> device is occupied by another multi-media application?
>
>
> DETAILS:
> $ rpm -q evolution
> evolution-2.6.1-1.fc5.2
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
n-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Furthermore, the message date headers (as seen with Ctrl-U) have not
> changed and still show the original (and correct) values.
>
> What gives?
>
> poc
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> htt
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-l
14024nfb
>
> What does it mean?
>
> :-)
> Al
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker -
>
> > _______
> > Evolution-list mailing list
> > Evolution-list@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
What is it?
>
> Is there a workaround?
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
; I have also just got a new monitor (LG Flatron L1718S) and it is running on
> the same "generic" settings of 1024x768 and 61Hz as my old one as I haven't
> had time to do any more sophisticated installation.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Desktop Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
ng list
> > Evolution-list@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Desktop Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL
> > Harish
> >
> point me to a .deb repository that has 2.8x that will work with UBUNTU
> Dapper and I'll be happy to
you'll have to consult your vendor.
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:42 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:56 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > AFAIK, no there isn't, but it would be nice.
> > >
&g
you need Exchange... this is one type of feature which needs to be done
on the server (it can't work on the client)
Jeff
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 10:39 +0930, Miles Humphrys wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to do an out of office reply for all
> incoming E-mails without having
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evolution 2.2.1 SuSe 9.3
Desired State:
All emails in mailbox "bb" (Big Brother Alarms") should be automatically deleted 5 days after I've received them. They are stale and have no lasting value.
What I've done:
Created a filter "If date received is before 5 days
looks to be an exercise in maximising wasted space to me... a bit
inefficient of a UI.
Just my humble opinion tho.
Jeff
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 02:36 +0200, Samuel Abels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created a mockup of what IMO is an improvement over the current
> UI; it can be seen, along with som
many of the features for each release come from customers and then
prioritised by management. the developers rarely ever get ,much of a say
as to what features get implemented for any given release.
holding a survey would not get good results as surveys are rarely
indiciative of what customers act
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:36 +0300, regatta wrote:
> On 9/26/05, Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > many of the features for each release come from customers and then
> > prioritised by management. the developers rarely ever get ,much of a say
> > as to wh
ork with 2.4.1 of
> evolution-data-server (which has the server code of exchange).
>
> Please upgrade evolution-exchange too.
>
> Thanks,
> Arunprakash.
>
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution
her system I need to debug?
>
> Chris
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[E
; http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
ing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http
y it free.
> http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
> _______
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROT
tion-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mail
hing to do with evolution using
> libglade (which I'm assuming is used to generate and load the xml)?
those aren't libglade xml files, they're bonobo xml files.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
et this comportement
> back?
> Thanks
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolut
ous session,
there's no way to do what you ask.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 09:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 15:06 +0200, guenther wrote:
>
> > As I'm not entirely sure what you're really about (and my memory of 1.x
> > versions is fading ;), here are a couple of notes that should cover your
> > issue.
> >
> > * When switchi
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 07:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:44 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments Jeff. They're interesting.
> >
> > On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 21:59 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wro
Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
nyway, so even
if I'm wrong, someone could easily take up the reigns and continue with
connector/evo development.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-lis
Evolution used iso-8859-5 - it is MUCH more likely that clients
will support is-8859-5 over UTF-8.
>
> Anyone?
>
> PS You can see the same stuff if you open the source of this message.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
ut in your spare time.
>
> Bill
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
_
ut too, to my chagrin.
> >
> > *Why* do they have to be HTML files?
>
> You just blew my mind.
>
> Actually, this is a very good question. My static signature is
> text/plain, too. So why is this different for signature scripts?
>
> Please, feel free to file a bug
uld do
> before installing it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jack
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
__
ders have unread emails in them,
> and how many there are.
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
he Inbox.
is it not marked as deleted in the original folder?
Trash is just a virtual folder, it is simply a view of all your other
folders showing all messages marked for deletion.
so as it happens, this is NOTABUG because it is working exactly as
intended.
--
Jeffrey Stedfas
ution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
> _______
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker
matters !)
>
> I can only say that I'd like to know as well.
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
dre
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
o just
> blithely kill everything.
>
> Lee
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.nove
e jeudi 05 janvier 2006 à 09:38 +0100, Franck Routier a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will do some research and try to have an argumented feature request.
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time to give me an informed opinion.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> &g
oject
> > > they have started. But it will take another year to get code
> > >
> > I guess, the current evolution + gnome-pilot works pretty well for all
> > palm OS enabled PDA devices. Atleast, it works for the three devices
> > that I have.
> >
>
gt; Thank you,
> Massimo
>
>
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
ng of said name would be:
=?iso-8859-1?q?Johan_Blond=E9?=
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
ta to be signed MUST first be converted to its content-
type specific canonical form. For text/plain, this means
conversion to an appropriate character set and conversion of
line endings to the canonical sequence.
This is what Evolution does.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Ev
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:53 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > Ok all,
> > >
> > > I'm cross posting this to bot
91 matches
Mail list logo
