On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 21:13 +1000, GeraldC wrote:
> Since Kmail2 is a nogoer on 64 bit systems
Que? Bug reference please.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To chan
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:44 +1000, Gerald wrote:
> The KDE site recommends reverting to kmail1 on the 64 bit systems
Reference please. Seriously, without a specific reference to a bug
https://bugs.kde.org/ this just isn't credible. I can't believe that
anyone these days would manage to write code
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:35 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> See
> http://library.gnome.org/users/evolution/3.5/exchange-connectors-overview.html
Hm, no mention of Evolution-ActiveSync there... :)
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:20 -0500, Eugene wrote:
> Unfortunately CAMEL_DEBUG=imap or CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx does not print
> outgoing communications, only incoming.
I don't quite understand what you mean by that.
First, please make sure that you are using the current "IMAP+" back end
for email, not th
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:59 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
>
> No need, it's already fixed in 3.5.3.
>
> The Delete button is now disabled for accounts bound to GNOME Online
> Accounts. They have to be deleted through the GNOME System Settings
> capplet (or whatever we're calling it these days).
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 20:19 -0500, Eugene wrote:
> When I changed IMAP to IMAP+ the Evolution crashed on startup. I had
> to use gconf-editor to edit /apps/evolution/mail key and disable my
> yahoo acoount. So far I am unable to change from IMAP to IMAP+ and
> keep Evolution up for testing.
Please
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 12:38 -0500, Eugene wrote:
> Old IMAP one can specify that deleted message be sent to a folder of
> choice, for example "Trash". I can't find this feature in IMAP+
> settings.
Not sure. Milan did that, I believe... and although I haven't looked
very hard, I was a little conc
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:59 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> So I'll resend this after one year:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> the Evolution user docs do not cover well syncing Evolution with other
> devices:
> http://library.gnome.org/users/evolution/3.5/sync-with-other-devices.html
It points to SyncEvolu
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:50 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> 1. The settings for sorting of messages were not kept. I had it on
> »Date« before and after starting Evolution 3.4 nothing was selected,
> which was quite confusing since messages are not displayed where they
> are supposed too.
The fact
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 10:34 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> > Even if I try one or both of these options, I can't seem to download
> > all of my stored messages from the server. The download begins and
> > then stops after which I have to manually start it again. Also
> > periodically I get a warni
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 16:00 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
>
> Speak of the devil...
>
> commit 1fd3da8927177ed0517abeaf3c7a29611d64546f
> Author: Matthew Barnes
> Date: Mon Dec 17 11:14:44 2012 -0500
>
> IMAPX: Support non-virtual Junk/Trash folders.
>
Yay! Thanks for doing this.
An
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:16 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> That doesn't sound that weird. *Sending* and *Receiving* are two
> entirely different operations. Receiving is POP/IMAP [and rarely
> blocked by firewalls], sending is SMTP [and almost always blocked by
> firewalls].
Sending should
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 10:47 -0800, Jeff Trefftzs wrote:
> I just upgraded from Fedora 13 to Fedora 18, and failed to successfully
> backup my old evolution files. What I did do was copy my entire $HOME
> directory to an external drive, and attempted to restore from there. To
> make a long story s
in the form of HTML/JS rather than native GUI code. It would
make the e-mail-factory approach a whole lot saner.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:17 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> Annoyingly some email clients and all handheld devices make it
> impossible to bottom post so i usually either avoid posting or delete
> out all the previous stuff so that no-one has any context.
We have plenty of context. The In-Reply-To: an
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 21:06 +0200, Vidar Evenrud Seeberg wrote:
> Den 05/30/2013 08:51 AM, skrev evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org:
> >
> > Hi,
> > it might be better to start with evolution itself, not with your admins.
> > I suggest to debug what the server returns to you. One UI way is to ope
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 09:09 +0200, Vidar Evenrud Seeberg wrote:
> Den 05/30/2013 11:49 PM, skrev David Woodhouse:
> > DTSTART:20130602T18
> > DTEND:20130602T19
> > Hm, that's odd. Shouldn't those end with a 'Z' to indicate that they are
>
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 09:27 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 22:49 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > DTSTART:20130602T18
> > > DTEND:20130602T19
> >
> > Hm, that's odd. Shouldn't those end with a 'Z' to indicate th
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 06:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 10:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > let's call it UTC, not GMT, to have same terminology as in RFC.
> >
> > I sometimes like to use 'GMT' just to reinforce t
On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 07:55 +0100, huw wrote:
> I'd restarted my PC, then put it into suspend. This morning I woke it
> up, loaded Evolution, and it promptly downloaded all the mail in my
> inbox again, as if it had never been there (via an IMAP account). I
> hadn't fiddled with any settings or d
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 09:47 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> Dnia 2013-08-13, wto o godzinie 23:57 +0100, Tom Davies pisze:
> > Hi :)
> > What should i install in order to get Exchange communicating with Evo?
> evolution-ews
>
> > Do i install the Ews things first
> not first, you install only EWS
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 23:36 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> IIRC later versions of IMAP allow expunging of single messages, but
> don't quote me.
They do. UID EXPUNGE was added in RFC4315.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:57 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> [cut]
> > The question is: Is it possible to have one account which uses Tor,
> > while the other is regular, and they work at the same time?
> [cut]
> There is a long waiting feature request for this:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 08:48 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
>
> thank you for that hints. They are for sure helpful, but for tech
> savvy
> people. Regular users won't even know what are you are talking about :)
It used to be simple enough even for regular users. But the setting has
now bee
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 17:10 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Of course, it can be a bug in evolution-ews. If you have some exact
> steps, then feel free to open a bug report in Gnome's bugzilla, thus
> it would be properly investigated.
There's also a (now-fixed) libsoup bug which would cause things to
ding the PacRunner request, assuming that things are working sanely,
and to have a manual override for the cases where that doesn't work.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 08:45 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > > Using the manual Junk button without having a junk processor installed
> > > is somewhat unusual. You might consider marking messages for later
> > > followup (Shift-Ctrl-G) or using labels.
> >
> > what I like about Ctrl-J is that mess
201 - 227 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
