Hi,
seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by
the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image" button,
over two buttons. IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing
views, at least an update should check, if a button already exists,
instead of addi
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by
> the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image"
> button,
> over two buttons. IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing
> view
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:51 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by
> > the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image"
> >
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:51 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by
> > the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image"
> >
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:51 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
> > wrote:
> > > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by
> > > the
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 15:34 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> adding this icon by a "hack" was quite important a while ago, not
> really
> a "random customizations". I don't have a link to the email archive
> at
> hand. However, those who suffer from the same "hack" and don't
> rememb
>
> I was just surprised to see a duplicated button/icon after an update. A
> button/icon that was seemingly considered as unneeded for several
> releases by the developers, hence the "hack".
>
I think that would be better phrased as "I was delighted to see that
the developers had found time to
I recently received the following two messages
from t...@prost-net.de addressed to me directly and not via the list. My
mail filter put them into my evolution folder and, on finding them
there, I unwisely read them. It appears that someone is using the list
to get addresses for phishing. Be forew
