On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 15:11 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Sorting tends to make Evo unresponsive for minutes and when Evo is
> responsive again, it usually doesn't kept the cursor position, what
> renders the sort sometimes useless. In addition I noticed that search
> filters sometimes present compl
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 13:25 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Which I said in my third post on this topic. However it's not only
> the 'subject' sort which suffers from this issue. The 'date' sort,
> which I have seen and tested personally - at a meeting of Company
> Directors, thank you very much - i
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 17:59 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> There was certainly talk of such an option being in the
> right-click menu. Is it something that has fallen by the wayside?
> Is it only possible with MIME formatted digests?
>
Hi,
evo still knows it, either right-click or the attac
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 18:45 +0100, Philipp Sandelmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem. Since my Email provider skipped SSL3 i cannot
> connect anymore to his imap-server, because he is using port 993 for
> TLS
> and evolution won't take notice of this port, even edited manually in
> one file
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 11:39 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Please install the packages containing the debug symbols and create a
> stacktrace/backtrace with the stored core dump file. (There should be a
> file `core.*`, containing the process ID 13377, somewhere on your
> system. Run `gdb -c path/to/c
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:11 -0700, Per wrote:
> Aha, I see that while the Message-id header is changed each time, the
> References header 'references' all previous Message-id values, in this
> format:
>
> References:
>
>
That should work as long as your correspondents respect threading
stand
Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> evo still knows it, either right-click or the attachment button has
> the option to reply to the list, but it requests multipart/digest, or
> simply have each message in a separate "attachment". The default
> option of the mailman is to use multipart/digest, as
G.W. Haywood wrote:
> One of the responses to my earlier comments was that if the thread is
> broken he would consider ignoring it.
After you stated that since you failed to see any problem, and thus you
didn't want to fix anything.
It *is* your problem if you express so badly that fail to be un
Am Sonntag, den 26.10.2014, 23:11 -0700 schrieb Per:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Thomas Mittelstaedt
> wrote:
>
> There exists an evolution plug-in for user defined email
> headers. It's
> part of the evolution-plugins package, at least on the old
> ubuntu
