On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 19:51 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Tuesday, May 29, 2012 a las 03:20:43PM +0100, Pete Biggs escribió:
>
> > > > > $ evo -t recipi...@zone.foo -a file-to-attach -m "short msg for boy"
> > > >
> > > That's a pitty and a missing feature, I think.
> >
> > Why not just
El día Wednesday, May 30, 2012 a las 10:17:54AM +0100, Pete Biggs escribió:
> Yes, of course I do - you never said though that Exchange was involved,
> if you did I wouldn't have suggested using the mail command. You asked
> for a command line mode to send emails,
I've asked for a command line m
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:11 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I've asked for a command line mode of Evo(!) to send mail using the
> infrastructure and config of Evo, but not for a general command line
> mode/tool to send mail;
>
> Is it worth to file this as a feature request for Evo?
No, as I would
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:11 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Wednesday, May 30, 2012 a las 10:17:54AM +0100, Pete Biggs escribió:
>
> > Yes, of course I do - you never said though that Exchange was involved,
> > if you did I wouldn't have suggested using the mail command. You asked
> > for a
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 07:21 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > I've asked for a command line mode of Evo(!) to send mail using the
> > infrastructure and config of Evo, but not for a general command line
> > mode/tool to send mail;
> > Is it worth to file this as a feature request for Evo
> I th
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 07:21 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
>
> Well, mailto: links work.
>
> awilliam@workstation:~> evolution \
>"mailto:awill...@whitemice.org?subject=dude you are so awesome"
>
> I doubt you can do attachments.
thomas@K7VT4A:~$ evolution \ "mailto:awill...@whi
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 19:27 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 07:21 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
> > Well, mailto: links work.
> > awilliam@workstation:~> evolution \
> >"mailto:awill...@whitemice.org?subject=dude you are so awesome"
> > I doubt you can do attachm
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 13:30 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 19:27 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 07:21 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
> > > Well, mailto: links work.
> > > awilliam@workstation:~> evolution \
> > >"mailto:awill
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 19:51 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> in my business world I have to
> use a MS Exchange server without SMTP and POP, only OWA, and for this I
> have to use either OutLook or Evo (free of this restriction I never
> would use Evo, but 'mutt' as MUA);
It's not that hard to scri
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:02 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> And of course you *can* specify a lot of things, including a message
> body, in a mailto: URL and have Evolution honour them all. But I don't
> think it goes as far as attachments. That might be hard to fix because I
> don't think you *wan
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 15:31 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> We support attachments in mailto: URLs; that's how nautilus-sendto talks
> to us. But we scrutinize each file name and discard anything suspicious
> looking based on a set of rules and then show a warning message about it
> in the composer
Sorry for the obscure subject line but I couldn't think of a better one.
I've just installed Evo 3.4.1 on Fedora 17 and seem to be having a
Senior Moment. There used to be a setting to adjust the time after which
Evo would automatically mark an opened message as read, but I can't seem
to find it n
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 19:17 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've just installed Evo 3.4.1 on Fedora 17 and seem to be having a
> Senior Moment. There used to be a setting to adjust the time after which
> Evo would automatically mark an opened message as read, but I can't seem
> to find it now.
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:32 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 19:17 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I've just installed Evo 3.4.1 on Fedora 17 and seem to be having a
> > Senior Moment. There used to be a setting to adjust the time after which
> > Evo would automatically ma
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 21:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> OK, thanks. Is there some rationale for removing this from the UI?
Purging the more esoteric and seldom used options to try and get the
window size under control. There's more to be done but it's a start.
Matthew Barnes
___
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 21:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > OK, thanks. Is there some rationale for removing this from the UI?
>
> Purging the more esoteric and seldom used options to try and get the
> window size under control. The
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2012, 22:13 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 21:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > OK, thanks. Is there some rationale for removing this from the UI?
>
> Purging the more esoteric and seldom used options to try and get the
> window size under cont
17 matches
Mail list logo
