Hello,
I have compiled FreeBSD and /usr/ports from CVS HEAD which brings Evo
2.32.1; Evo starts fine (if I don't count the kerberos message), but
calendar ist not working, it gives only:
** (evolution:44013): WARNING **: Unexpected kerberos error -1765328164
** (evolution:44013): WARNING **:
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 10:56 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
>
> I have compiled FreeBSD and /usr/ports from CVS HEAD which brings Evo
> 2.32.1; Evo starts fine (if I don't count the kerberos message), but
> calendar ist not working, it gives only:
>
>
> ** (evolution:44013): WARNING **: Unexpect
> - Forwarded message from David Woodhouse -
>
> Updating to 2.32.3 might be a good idea too, before going much further.
>
> --
> David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
> david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
>
I
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 16:14 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> It seems that 2.32.1 is the latest in the FreeBSD' ports? Is it possible
> to compile it directly from the sources, and if so is there any guide
> for this? Thanks
The differences should be so small that you ought to be able to just use
y
> - Forwarded message from David Woodhouse -
>
>
> On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 16:14 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > It seems that 2.32.1 is the latest in the FreeBSD' ports? Is it possible
> > to compile it directly from the sources, and if so is there any guide
> > for this? Thanks
>
> Th
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 18:05 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I've unpacked the source into /usr/ports/mail/evolution/work and renamed
> the top level dir to .1; the patching to FreeBSD went (perhaps) fine but
> the evo ./configure can't find its requirements, at least it is missing
> this:
Building
El dÃa Sunday, April 24, 2011 a las 07:06:50PM +0100, David Woodhouse
escribió:
> On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 18:05 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > I've unpacked the source into /usr/ports/mail/evolution/work and renamed
> > the top level dir to .1; the patching to FreeBSD went (perhaps) fine but
>
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 20:19 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El dÃa Sunday, April 24, 2011 a las 07:06:50PM +0100, David Woodhouse
> escribió:
> > Building evolution-2.32.3 requires evolution-data-server-2.32.3, but you
> > still seem to have e-d-s 2.32.1.
>
> Is this as well in the evolution-2.3
