[Evolution] Import address book

2009-10-11 Thread masatheesh
Hi, I am using Evolution 2.12.3.Here I want to import my yahoo address book which is in csv format.Please help me to do it. Regards, M.Satheesh. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evoluti

[Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad My own opinion - jon ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evo

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Top Post - Good > Bottom Post - Good > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted message)? If th

Re: [Evolution] Import address book

2009-10-11 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
Hum! Evolution 2.12 is a little bit older. In Evo 2.22 you choose File>Import>Import from a file and then select the file. May be some words in the menu are not exactly in that way but this is it. I'm using the spanish version. Hope you find it useful Sylvia El dom, 11-10-2009 a las 22:28 +

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote: > I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution > 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day). I too have had chronic stability problems with Evolution, namely evolution-2.26.3 running under Fed

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > Top Post - Good > > Bottom Post - Good > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad > How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post > (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted message)? If > that is bad, why don't we just standardize ... Wh

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:15 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Top Post - Good > > > Bottom Post - Good > > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad > > How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post > > (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:10 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote: > > I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution > > 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day). > > I too have had chronic stabili

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:29 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > >Top Post - Good > > Bottom Post - Good > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad > > How about a thread where some people top-po

[Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
There should be one. That is of the form: Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send it to the list. jon ___

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Pete Biggs
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > There should be one. That is of the form: > Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org > > Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather > than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send > it

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a > problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the > list. Well, I did it. Now I feel like an idiot. Briefly the description is "Evolution free

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > There should be one. That is of the form: > Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org > > Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather > than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send > it

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:56 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > There should be one. That is of the form: > > Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org > > > > Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather > > than Reply-t

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a > > problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the > > list. > > Well, I did it.

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a > > > problem, and don't just report

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:56 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > > There should be one. That is of the form: > > > Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org > > > > > > Recently (and not

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > If you want the message to go to the mailing list, hit "Reply To > > List" (Ctrl-L), not "Reply to All", that will make your reply go to > the > > proper place as derived from the mail headers and makes sure the > person > > you are rep

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem > to get any attention from the devels. I guess once they do that then a > customizable icon bar (which

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for > > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem > > to get any attention from the devels.

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread B. Joshua Rosen
Matthew and the other developers, I think it's a terrible mistake to be adding any new features to Evolution until the bugs have been fixed. Nobody cares about customizable toolbars or keyboard shortcuts, those things can wait. Evolution is in a terrible state at the moment. It crashes all of the

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 22:17 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote: > The most important things to users are, > > 1) Reliablity. A program should work all of the time, it should never > crash or hang. Nothing else matters if a program is as unstable as > Evolution has become. I agree. While it's true that

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:14 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for > > > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for > > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem > > to get any attention from the devels.

Re: [Evolution] Need help with Caldav or WebDav support for group calendars

2009-10-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 15:48 -0400, Steven Sprague wrote: > Hell List, > I have tried to setup a Webdav group calendar and use it with Apache - > fails. > I also tried to setup/create a Caldav calendar on the same server - not > using Apache - fails. > Does anyone have a setup for a group calendar

[Evolution] names change using LDAP

2009-10-11 Thread Lars Schade
Hi there, I am in the process of setting up an LDAP-addressbook for a small non-profit nature conservation group. The LDAP-server runs fine, connecting to the addressbook also functions. But there is a strange problem or feature I need some help with: To illustrate the issue I start with a local

[Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Chapinha 2008
Hello, I couldn´t make an account in Evolution's development site, so I will make a proposal of a new feature for Evolution here. I've used MS-Outlook for a long time, and a feature I think was very useful is the possibility to convert several messages to PDF, printing them in a PDF printer, for

Re: [Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:32 -0300, Chapinha 2008 wrote: > Hello, > > I couldn´t make an account in Evolution's development site, so I will > make a proposal of a new feature for Evolution here. If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create a login to report bugs and enh

Re: [Evolution] names change using LDAP

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:46 +0200, Lars Schade wrote: > To illustrate the issue I start with a local addressbook and add a new > contact using the evolution GUI say for the Berlin Office of a company > called "The Big Wheel", and I fill in the name dialog as given name > "Berlin Office" and as fami

Re: [Evolution] Evolution-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 20

2009-10-11 Thread Tim McConnell
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 03:57 +, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote: > Matthew and the other developers, > > I think it's a terrible mistake to be adding any new features to > Evolution until the bugs have been fixed. Nobody cares about > customizable toolbars or keyboard shortcuts, thos

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:21 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > Also, when mentioning a BZ report here on the list it's conventional to > > give the bug number (or better, the URL of the BZ page) in case someone > > wants to add anything. > > Also quite right. It's bug 528393. > https://bugz

Re: [Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create > a login to report bugs and enhancement requests such as this one), what > exactly is the problem? I have been filing my bugs at RedHat's Bugzilla, namely:

Re: [Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 21:56 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create > > a login to report bugs and enhancement requests such as this one), what > > exactly is the prob

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability (was: Re: Evolution-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 20)

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Please don't reply to digests. 1- The Subject is meaningless unless you edit it (see above) 2- It breaks the threading 3- In many cases (though not this time) clueless users quote the entire digest in order to reply to one message. Note that you can post via Gmane if you don't want to subscribe i

Re: [Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 21:56 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create > > a login to report bugs and enhancement requests such as this one), what > > exactly is the prob

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment > completely: > for Evo in particular this means what type of email are you reading? > Local spool? POP/POP3? IMAP? Exchange using the old > evolution-exchange backend? Exchange us