On 2008-08-30, 14:13 GMT, Bernhard Beyen wrote:
> Anyway, first of all why is there no easy feedback mechanism?
> I would appreciate having a dedicated email address to write to
> about how rubbish my experience has been so far.
Maybe you have answered your own question? ;-) (sorry, cannot
res
On 2008-09-04, 02:57 GMT, Axel wrote:
> I just wanted to reiterate that I don't think it should be
> implemented in this way in offline mode. It is counter
> intuitive. In effect, it would probably be better to hide these
> messages in the trash folder, to avoid confusion.
Please, don't use
Thanks for your help, in-advance. I've noticed lately when I check my
work email via OWA and read items (i.e. they are marked read), they
are not in my Inbox when I fire-up Evolution (version 2.22.3.1). Is
this a simple option I'm missing to show ALL emails or is this a
feature Evolution doesn't ha
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 17:15 -0700, marcello wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure what happens if the IMAP server my account resides
>> on
>> crashes and the provider is not able to restore my folders contents.
>>
>> Having enabled the "Automatically synchronize remote m
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 15:24 -0400, Bryan Moore wrote:
> Thanks for your help, in-advance. I've noticed lately when I check my
> work email via OWA and read items (i.e. they are marked read), they
> are not in my Inbox when I fire-up Evolution (version 2.22.3.1). Is
> this a simple option I'm missin
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 15:24 -0400, Bryan Moore wrote:
> Thanks for your help, in-advance. I've noticed lately when I check my
> work email via OWA and read items (i.e. they are marked read), they
> are not in my Inbox when I fire-up Evolution (version 2.22.3.1). Is
> this a simple option I'm missin
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:26 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> The fact that Microsoft Outlook didn't grok how deleting of IMAP
> messages should be done, doesn’t mean that everybody has to
> follow this bad example. Just opposite, I am working as hard as
> I can to revert other email clients to work co
Hi;
The commit
[http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=36116]
introduced a new copyright header for evolution/widgets/misc/e-spinner.[ch]
[http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution/trunk/widgets/misc/e-spinner.c?limit_changes=0&r1=36116&r2=36115&pathrev=36116]
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 02:34 -0700, marcello wrote:
> The problem seems quite general to me and I
> cannot believe that there is not a built-in procedure to accomplish
> this
> (something like a configurable warning before the synchronization
> process
> deletes locally stored messages).
I would as
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 16:23 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 15:24 -0400, Bryan Moore wrote:
> > Thanks for your help, in-advance. I've noticed lately when I check my
> > work email via OWA and read items (i.e. they are marked read), they
> > are not in my Inbox when I fire-up Evo
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 08:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:10 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote:
> > Possible by using search folders. Set up a search folder and in the
> > criteria 'Include Threads' use 'All related' .
>
> Which doesn't work in 2.23.91 (with db-summary) at the moment
Chris Williams-17 wrote:
>
> I don't disagree that it can be convenient to have those messages
> retrievable from a local store in an emergency, but trying to treat a
> cached copy of your IMAP account as a backup just isn't very safe. As
> you've pointed out, backing up those messages, while t
12 matches
Mail list logo
