On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 20:31 -0400, Jay Daniels wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:49 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:54 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> > > Can someone explain why I'd want to place Evolution in offline mode
> > > manually?
> >
> > You're boarding a pl
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 14:13 +1000, Nick Jenkins wrote:
> > > > It would be a lot better if instead of greying out the
> > > > "send/receive" button if it switched to saying "work online"
> > > >
> > > > I spent time wondering if I had been hacked because of this!
> > >
> > > Work offline shoul
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:49 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:54 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> > Can someone explain why I'd want to place Evolution in offline mode
> > manually?
>
> You're boarding a plane and want to continue reading email.
>
> Matthew Barnes
>
on
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:42 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 08:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > > Work offline should be transparent to the user.
> > >
> > >
> > > jay
> >
> > Besides, there's already an indicator of 'work offline' (a disconnected
> > plug at the bottom-left
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:54 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Can someone explain why I'd want to place Evolution in offline mode manually?
You're boarding a plane and want to continue reading email.
Matthew Barnes
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evo
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 14:13 +1000, Nick Jenkins wrote:
> Surely "Send/receive" is
> meaningless if you're offline?
Receive doesn't make sense offline, but Send does, as the message can be
queued until Evo goes online. (Actually Receive could also make sense if
it's receiving from a local mail serv
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:54 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Can someone explain why I'd want to place Evolution in offline mode manually?
I've sometimes done it because I want to try something without
contacting a server. It happens.
poc
___
Evolut
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Nick Jenkins wrote:
>> > > It would be a lot better if instead of greying out the
>> > > "send/receive" button if it switched to saying "work online"
>
> I'm kind of with the original poster.
>
> So to me, it makes sense to try doing something different with this
Can someone explain why I'd want to place Evolution in offline mode manually?
Jo-Erlend Schinstad
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> Since Linux may become more popular in the future to where nongeeks use
> it I would like to suggest a slight improvement to Evolution email.
>
> When the send/receive button gets greyed out it seems like there might
> be a bug in the soft
>
> I am normally not a Mac user. However my wife has a MacBook that I was
> using recently with a wireless network. The network went away for 5
> minutes. All the apps went into "Offline mode". Then the wireless
> network came book (I don't why) and viola the apps went "Online mode"
> again.
>
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 22:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:09 -0400, Jay Daniels wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> > > Since Linux may become more popular in the future to where nongeeks use
> > > it I would like to suggest a slight im
> > > It would be a lot better if instead of greying out the
> > > "send/receive" button if it switched to saying "work online"
> > >
> > > I spent time wondering if I had been hacked because of this!
> >
> > Work offline should be transparent to the user.
>
> Besides, there's already an indi
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:09 -0400, Jay Daniels wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> > Since Linux may become more popular in the future to where nongeeks use
> > it I would like to suggest a slight improvement to Evolution email.
> >
> > When the send/receive button g
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:42 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 08:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > > Work offline should be transparent to the user.
> > >
> > >
> > > jay
> >
> > Besides, there's already an indicator of 'work offline' (a disconnected
> > plug at the bottom-left)
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 08:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Work offline should be transparent to the user.
> >
> >
> > jay
>
> Besides, there's already an indicator of 'work offline' (a disconnected
> plug at the bottom-left). Its obvious what it means once you think to
> look.
I dispute the obvi
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:09 -0400, Jay Daniels wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> > Since Linux may become more popular in the future to where nongeeks use
> > it I would like to suggest a slight improvement to Evolution email.
> >
> > When the send/receive button g
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> Since Linux may become more popular in the future to where nongeeks use
> it I would like to suggest a slight improvement to Evolution email.
>
> When the send/receive button gets greyed out it seems like there might
> be a bug in the soft
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> Since Linux may become more popular in the future to where nongeeks use
> it I would like to suggest a slight improvement to Evolution email.
>
> When the send/receive button gets greyed out it seems like there might
> be a bug in the soft
Suggestions are filed on http://bugzilla.gnome.org.
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
20 matches
Mail list logo
