On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:11 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > > I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> > > traces:
> >
> > Good stuff! I modified it to just displ
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> > traces:
>
> Good stuff! I modified it to just display the output on stdout, then I
> can put it where I want it by hand.
>
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> > traces:
>
> Good stuff! I modified it to just display the output on stdout, then I
> can put it where I want it by hand.
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> traces:
Good stuff! I modified it to just display the output on stdout, then I
can put it where I want it by hand.
Just a note: if you add "set pagination off" to your GDB script,
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:57 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:00 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I'm not familiar with apport. Is this an Ubuntu thing?
>
> It is. As you can see in the script though, that that is only required
> if you give my script a
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:00 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> Actually, I'm not familiar with apport. Is this an Ubuntu thing?
It is. As you can see in the script though, that that is only required
if you give my script a /var/crash/ file. If you really wanted to, you
could simply remove th
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > Description of problem:
> > > Several times a day evoluti
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> >
> > Description:
> > Description of problem:
> > Several times a day evolution freezes, doesn't respond to
> input or
> > refresh its window.
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> These types of problems almost always require a stack trace of the
> hung-up process. I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> traces:
Thanks. Evolution has just hung, and I have put the script to use.
jon
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:52 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
> > > recommend the OP to take a loo
> "Devels" know about the bugs I am reporting. I really don't think lack
> of bug reporting is the issue here. What appears (granted, from the
> outside, so I only have one view) to be at issue here -- and Evolution
> is not really any different than most other projects -- is that the
> attractio
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>
> Description:
> Description of problem:
> Several times a day evolution freezes, doesn't respond to input or
> refresh its window. Generally, if I click on the window decoration to
> delete the w
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> I've seen occasional hangs with 2.26.3
Admittedly I am only using 2.26.1 (with a couple of patches from
subsequent releases) but that's because nothing in any of the bugs that
I have open indicate that a newer version will cure mai
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
> > recommend the OP to take a look at
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570438 since it's
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:50 -0400, Ben May wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
> > > recommend the OP to take a look at
>
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
> > recommend the OP to take a look at
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570438 since it
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> In this case that's right. In fact now that I've had some sleep I'd
> recommend the OP to take a look at
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570438 since it's an
> LDAP-related problem I reported in February which Srini gave m
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 04:39 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 01:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
> > > completely:
> > > for Evo in particular this means wh
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 01:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
> > completely:
> > for Evo in particular this means what type of email are you reading?
> > Local spool? POP/POP3?
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
> completely:
> for Evo in particular this means what type of email are you reading?
> Local spool? POP/POP3? IMAP? Exchange using the old
> evolution-exchange backend? Exchange us
Please don't reply to digests.
1- The Subject is meaningless unless you edit it (see above)
2- It breaks the threading
3- In many cases (though not this time) clueless users quote the entire
digest in order to reply to one message.
Note that you can post via Gmane if you don't want to subscribe i
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:21 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Also, when mentioning a BZ report here on the list it's conventional to
> > give the bug number (or better, the URL of the BZ page) in case someone
> > wants to add anything.
>
> Also quite right. It's bug 528393.
> https://bugz
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a
> > > problem, and don't just report
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a
> > problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the
> > list.
>
> Well, I did it.
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a
> problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the
> list.
Well, I did it. Now I feel like an idiot. Briefly the description
is "Evolution free
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:10 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote:
> > I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution
> > 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day).
>
> I too have had chronic stabili
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote:
> I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution
> 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day).
I too have had chronic stability problems with Evolution, namely
evolution-2.26.3 running under Fed
27 matches
Mail list logo
