Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-24 Thread bobthi
O.K. I understand and I give up. Nonetheless I wonder why other clients have this possibility. Thanks and bye. — Roberto On 23 Oct 2017, at 18:54, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:04 +0200, bob thi wrote: >> My goal is to have all the mail boxes on the same level of the root >> and e

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-23 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:54 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:04 +0200, bob thi wrote: > > My goal is to have all the mail boxes on the same level of the root > > and eliminate the subfolders. > > Hi, > I see. I'm afraid that they are under Inbox and the Inbox is an "always

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:04 +0200, bob thi wrote: > My goal is to have all the mail boxes on the same level of the root > and eliminate the subfolders. Hi, I see. I'm afraid that they are under Inbox and the Inbox is an "always added folder", then causing subfolders of Inbox shown on the s

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-23 Thread bob thi
Hello, My goal is to have all the mail boxes on the same level of the root and eliminate the subfolders. — Roberto On 23 Oct 2017, at 15:30, Milan Crha wrote: On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 12:36 +0200, bob thi wrote: But I don’t know how to set up my NAMESPACE field. Hi, I see from the lo

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 12:36 +0200, bob thi wrote: > But I don’t know how to set up my NAMESPACE field. Hi, I see from the log that it lists only folders under the Inbox folder, thus it does what you told it to do, as far as I can tell. What are you trying to achieve, please? Bye,

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-23 Thread bob thi
This is the result: [imapx:A] I/O: '* OK IMAP4 ready' [imapx:A] I/O: 'A0 CAPABILITY' [imapx:A] I/O: '* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ENABLE UIDPLUS SASL-IR NAMESPACE CONDSTORE SORT LIST-EXTENDED QRESYNC MOVE SPECIAL-USE CREATE-SPECIAL-USE IDLE AUTH=PLAIN A0 OK completed' [imapx:A]

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 19:15 +0200, bob thi wrote: > I tried to edit: > [Imapx Backend] > Namespace=INBOX > UseNamespace=true > but it doesn’t work. > My version of Evo is 3.26.1 Hi, some change sin underlying files may require restart of evolution itself, to take into effect. Another thing

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-22 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 18:21 +0200, Roberto Thiella wrote: > Is it possible to set up an imap path prefix in Evolution? > I can’t find out how. You already asked this under a different name. Please refrain from using more than one email account for the Evolution list. poc _

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-21 Thread bob thi
I tried to edit: [Imapx Backend] Namespace=INBOX UseNamespace=true but it doesn’t work. My version of Evo is 3.26.1 — Roberto On 21 Oct 2017, at 18:46, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 18:27 +0200, bob thi wrote: >> Is it possible to set up an imap path prefix in Evolution?

Re: [Evolution] imap path prefix

2017-10-21 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 18:27 +0200, bob thi wrote: > Is it possible to set up an imap path prefix in Evolution? > I can’t find out how. https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2014-November/msg00116.html comes to my mind but not sure that's still the situation. Also, which version do you use